Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

) The Director Of School Education vs ) S.R.Chandru Manikandan
2021 Latest Caselaw 23560 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23560 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2021

Madras High Court
) The Director Of School Education vs ) S.R.Chandru Manikandan on 1 December, 2021
                                                                        W.A(MD)No.2145 of 2021


                                  BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   DATED : 01.12.2021

                                                        CORAM :

                     THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
                                            and
                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

                                                W.A(MD)No.2145 of 2021
                                                         and
                                               CMP(MD)No.10164 of 2021

                     1) The Director of School Education,
                        DPI Campus,
                        College Road, Chennai.

                     2) The Joint Director of School Education (Higher Secondary),
                        DPI Campus,
                        College Road, Chennai.

                     3) The Chief Educational Officer,
                        Tuticorin District.

                     4) The District Educational Officer,
                        Tuticorin District.                                   ... Appellants

                                                           vs.

                     1) S.R.Chandru Manikandan

                     2) Karapettai Nadar Higher Secondary School,
                        Tuticorin,
                        Rep by its Secretary,
                        N.T.Selvaraj,
                        Tuticorin District.                                   ... Respondents


                                  Appeal filed under Clause XV of Letters Patent, against the
                     order dated 12.07.2021 made in W.P(MD)No.37 of 2021.


                     Page 1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                          W.A(MD)No.2145 of 2021


                                       For Appellants     : Mr.M.Siddharthan
                                                                Additional Government Pleader
                                       For R1             : Mr.V.Meenakshisundaram for
                                                                Mr.G.Mohankumar



                                                         JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.)

The appeal is by the Government, challenging the order

passed in W.P(MD)No.37 of 2021, dated 12.07.2021.

2. The writ petition was filed challenging the order of the

3rd appellant dated 09.12.2020, wherein, the approval of the

appointment of the writ petitioner as Office Assistant, in the 2nd

respondent school, was rejected. The writ petitioner was appointed

as Office Assistant on 11.06.2018. A proposal was sent to the

appellants for approval. As there was no order passed, the writ

petition was filed, seeking a Mandamus, for considering the same,

after which, the same was considered and the 3rd appellant rejected

the proposal, on the ground of non approval of the Secretary of the

school and the list of candidates furnished by the employment

exchange. The said rejection was challenged in a writ petition.

Page 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.2145 of 2021

3. In the meanwhile, there was some dispute with regard

to the post of Secretary in the 2nd respondent school and there were

writ petitions filed in W.P(MD)Nos.19905 and 19906 of 2017 and

there was an interim order granted by this Court. The request of

the school to furnish the list of candidates, was rejected by the

employment exchange, on the ground that there was no Secretary

in the 2nd respondent school. Therefore, a notification was issued in

the daily newspaper and the 2nd respondent conducted interview

and appointed the writ petitioner, who is the 1st respondent herein,

as Office Assistant.

4. Against the dismissal of the Writ Petition(MD)Nos.19905

and 19906 of 2017, Writ Appeal(MD)Nos.1711 and 1712 of 2018

were filed. The said appeals were decided on 08.05.2019 and the

writ appeals were allowed, as the erstwhile Secretary himself, who

contested in the election, was elected again as Secretary in the 2nd

respondent school and the said Secretary had appointed the writ

petitioner as Office Assistant. Therefore, when the Secretary was in

the office, the said appointment was made. The Writ Court had

allowed the writ petition.

Page 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.2145 of 2021

5. In fact, in the judgment of the writ appeals, the question

of the powers of the Secretaries when the order of interim stay in

force, was also discussed, which was relied upon by the learned

single Judge and allowed the writ petition. Therefore, the objection

raised by the Government that the approval for appointment made

by the Secretary, who was not in office, is erroneous and the said

argument is not sustainable, as already the Division Bench held that

the appointment made by the Secretary was valid.

6. We see no reason to interfere in the order passed by the

learned single Judge. The Writ Appeal deserves to be dismissed and

accordingly dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.



                                                                [P.S.N.,J.]  &   [P.V.,J.]
                                                                         01.12.2021
                     Index             : Yes / No

                     To

1) The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai.

2) The Joint Director of School Education (Higher Secondary), DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai.

Page 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.2145 of 2021

3) The Chief Educational Officer, Tuticorin District.

4) The District Educational Officer, Tuticorin District.

Page 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD)No.2145 of 2021

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

and P.VELMURUGAN, J.

bala

JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)No.2145 of 2021 DATED : 01.12.2021

Page 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter