Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bharath vs Kumar
2021 Latest Caselaw 17710 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17710 Mad
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2021

Madras High Court
Bharath vs Kumar on 31 August, 2021
                                                                              C.M.A.No.2085 of 2021

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 31.08.2021

                                                          CORAM:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
                                               and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                                 C.M.A.No.2085 of 2021
                 Bharath                                                            ... Appellant

                                                            Vs.

                 1.Kumar

                 2.New India Ass. Co. Ltd.,
                   Motor III Party Claims Office,
                   No.232, N.S.C Bose Road,
                   Bombay Mutual Building 6th Floor,
                   Chennai -1.
                                                                                    ... Respondents


                 PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor
                 Vehicles Act 1988 to set aside the award passed in MCOP No.3968 of 2016 dated
                 18.02.2020 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Judge-II, Court of
                 Small Causes, Chennai and enhance the award amount.

                                    For Appellant     :    Mrs.Maithri Mahalingam
                                    For Respondents   :    Mr.J.Chandran (for R2)
                                                           R1 – Exparte


                 1/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                               C.M.A.No.2085 of 2021

                                                     JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.SIVAGNANAM, J.]

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and

Decree dated 18.02.2020, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, II

Special Judge, Court of Small Causes at Chennai in M.C.O.P.No.3968 of 2016.

2.By the impugned Judgment and Decree, the Tribunal has awarded a sum

of Rs.10,46,400/- as compensation together with interest at 7.5% per annum from

the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of deposit, to the

appellant/claimant for the injury sustained by him in a road accident.

3.The brief facts are that on 04.06.2016 at 12.45 p.m, the claimant was

painting the wall in 100 Feet Road Bridge at Thirumangalam. At that time, a car

bearing Reg.No.TN-05-AR-5151 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent

manner, dashed the claimant and others. In the accident, the claimant sustained

grievous injuries. Though he claimed Rs.40,00,000/- as compensation, the

Tribunal has awarded Rs.10,46,400/- together with interest at 7.5% per annum,

under the following heads:-

                                             Heads                          Rs.
                             Loss of dependency 14700x12x30/100x17         8,99,640/-



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                               C.M.A.No.2085 of 2021

                                                 Heads                       Rs.
                             Pain and Sufferings                             35,000/-
                             Transportation                                  15,000/-
                             Extra Nourishment                               30,000/-
                             Damage of Cloth and Articles                      1,000/-
                             Attendant Charges                               15,000/-
                             Loss of Estate                                  35,000/-
                             Loss of Future Prospectus                       15,000/-
                             Medical Expenses                                      750/-
                             Total                                        10,46,390/-
                             Rounded off                                  10,46,400/-


4.The learned counsel for the appellant/claimant would contend that since

the amount awarded by the Tribunal is meager in all the heads, the claimant is

entitled for higher compensation. He would further submit that immediately after

the accident the claimant was treated as inpatient at KMC Hospital, Chennai from

04.06.2016 to 13.08.2016 for 70 days and the same day, buddy strapping was

done to the 5th Proximal Phalanx Fracture. Thereafter, on 14.06.2016 to stabilize

the fractured bone, steel rods were fixed in his right thigh with external fixation.

Thereafter, on 22.07.2016, the claimant underwent surgery for right ankle fracture

and for extensive loss of skin, the skin was taken from the right thigh and skin

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2085 of 2021

grafting was done. Thereafter, skin grafting was done in the right ankle. On

03.08.2016 and 08.08.2016, operations had been done for fractures of left leg and

right thigh. Again, the claimant was admitted as in-patient from 01.09.2016 to

24.09.2016 and his right ankle puss discharge was cleaned and dressed every day

and on 12.09.2016 also, a surgery was conducted. After discharged, the claimant

was completed bed-ridden for one year. Hence, the claimant seeks enhancement

of compensation.

5.Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent Insurance

Company submitted that the impugned Judgment and Decree awarding the

aforesaid compensation is well reasoned and it requires no interference and

therefore, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is liable to be dismissed.

6.This Court carefully considered the submissions of the learned counsel

for the appellant/claimant and the learned counsel appearing for the second

respondent/Insurance Company and perused the materials available on record.

7.According to the learned counsel for the appellant/claimant, so many

surgeries had been conducted on the claimant. The said contention has been

proved through the evidence of P.W.2, Dr.K.J.Mathiyalagan and Exs.P.2 to 8,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2085 of 2021

Exs.P.12 and 13. Therefore, considering the nature of injuries and the period of

treatment undergone by the claimant, this Court is of the view that the amounts

awarded under the head of pain and sufferings, extra nourishment, attendant

charges, loss of estate and loss of future prospectus have to be enhanced. The

amounts awarded under the head of loss of dependency, transportation, damage of

cloth and articles and medical expenses are reasonable and they are unaltered.

Hence, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal to the appellant/claimant is re-

quantified as follows:-

                                                 Heads                    Rs.
                             Loss of dependency 14700x12x30/100x17      8,99,640/-
                             Pain and Sufferings                        1,00,000/-
                             Transportation                               15,000/-
                             Extra Nourishment                            50,000/-
                             Damage of Cloth and Articles                  1,000/-
                             Attendant Charges                            50,000/-
                             Loss of Estate                               50,000/-
                             Loss of Future Prospectus                    50,000/-
                             Medical Expenses                                   750/-
                             Total                                     12,16,390/-
                             Rounded off                               12,16,400/-






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                               C.M.A.No.2085 of 2021

8.In such view of the matter, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly

allowed. The second respondent/Insurance Company is directed to deposit the

modified award amount with accrued interest and costs, less the amount already

deposited, if any, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order. On such deposit, the claimant is permitted to withdraw the amount

after filing a memo, along with a copy of this order, less the amount if already

withdrawn. No costs.

                                                                [M.K.K.S.,J.]            [V.S.G.,J.]
                                                                         31.08.2021

                 Intex             : Yes/No
                 Internet          : Yes/No
                 skn
                 To

1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Judge-II, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

2.V.R.Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.No.2085 of 2021

and V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

skn

JUDGMENT MADE IN C.M.A.No.2085 of 2021

31.08.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter