Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sankara Traders vs The Commercial Tax Officer (St)
2021 Latest Caselaw 17410 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17410 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2021

Madras High Court
Sankara Traders vs The Commercial Tax Officer (St) on 25 August, 2021
                                                                                  W.P.No.17492 of 2021

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATE: 25.08.2021

                                                        CORAM

                                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

                                               W.P.No.17492 of 2021
                                                        &
                                              W.M.P.No.18584 of 2021


                      Sankara Traders
                      Represented by its Proprietor
                      Saurabh Munot
                      64/1, Bazaar Street
                      Chimdambaram – 608 001                              ... Petitioner


                                                          Vs.

                      The Commercial Tax Officer (ST)
                      (State Tax Officer)
                      Chidambaram-1                                       ... Respondent

                                 Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                      for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records on
                      the files of the respondent herein in TIN-33774442559/2014-15 dated
                      7.7.2021 quashing the same with the direction to furnish Xerox copies of
                      D-7 records referred to in the impugned order along with the opportunity
                      of being heard.

                                For Petitioner        : Mr.N.Inbarajan


                                For Respondent        : Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik
                                                        Government Advocate

http://www.judis.nic.in
                      1/6
                                                                                 W.P.No.17492 of 2021

                                                   ORDER

Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier

proceedings made on 23.08.2021 in the captioned main writ petition and

'Writ Miscellaneous Petitions' ('WMPs' in plural and 'WMP' in singular

for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity) therein, which reads as

follows:

'Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned State counsel accepts

notice on behalf of sole respondent.

2. List in the motion list day-after-tomorrow i.e,.

25.08.2021.'

2. Learned Revenue counsel says, he has since obtained

instructions. This Virtual Court with the consent of learned counsel for

writ petitioner Mr.N.Inbarajan and learned Revenue counsel

Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, takes up the main writ petition as the entire matter

turns on a very narrow compass.

3. Short facts shorn of elaboration will suffice. Short facts are

that the writ petitioner is an authorized distributor of wet and dry X-Ray

films and that writ petitioner is registered under 'Tamil Nadu Value

Added Tax Act, 2006' ('TNVAT Act' for the sake of brevity) and there

was deemed assessment; that the enforcement wing of respondent

http://www.judis.nic.in

W.P.No.17492 of 2021

Department recovered D-7 forms resulting in assessment under Section

27 of TNVAT Act on the ground that it is assessment of escaped turn

over; that the order made under Section 27 of TNVAT Act has been

called in question inter alia on the ground that Narasus principle being

ratio in Tvl.Narasus Roller Flour Mills Vs. The Commercial Tax

Officer (Enforcement Wing), Sankagiri reported in 2015 81 VST 560

which inturn was made by following an earlier Hon'ble Division Bench

judgment in Madras Granites Private Limited Vs. CTO., reported in

146 CTC Page No.642 has been given a go by; that it is to be noted that

this principle is to the effect that the Assessing Authority exercising best

judgment assessment qua alleged escaped assessment should not go

solely / blindly by the report of the Enforcement Wing officials and

should independently make an assessment.

4. As already alluded to supra, the entire matter turns on a very

narrow compass as two orders made by this Court [one by me and

another by Hon'ble Justice Dr.Anita Sumanth] in Ponny Stores Vs. The

State Tax Officer (dated 22.07.2019) and Gayathri Agency Vs.

Assistant Commissioner (ST) (dated 24.02.2021) respectively, under

similar circumstances are directly and squarely applicable to the case on

http://www.judis.nic.in

W.P.No.17492 of 2021

hand. This Court is informed without any disputation or disagreement

that aforesaid two orders in Ponny Stores and Gayathri Agency cases

have not been carried in appeal by way of intra-court appeals and they

have been given quietus. This Court is also informed without any

disputation or disagreement that the orders and directives therein have

since been complied with.

5. Therefore, on the short point of Madras Granite and

Narasus principles infraction, captioned writ petition is disposed of by

passing the following order:

a) The impugned Assessment order dated

7.7.2021 bearing reference TIN-33774442559/2014-15 is

set aside;

b) The impugned Assessment Order is set aside

solely on the ground of infraction of Narasus and

Madras granite principles (not making the assessment

independent of the Enforcement Wing report) without

expressing any view or opinion on the other aspects of the

matter;

c) The respondent shall furnish photocopies of http://www.judis.nic.in

W.P.No.17492 of 2021

the D-7 records referred to in the impugned order to the

writ petitioner under due acknowledgement on or before

15.09.2021.

d) Post furnishing the aforementioned

photocopies i.e., post 15.09.2021, Respondent shall make

the assessment afresh independent of the proposals given

by the Enforcement Wing in tune with Madras Granite /

Narasus principle.

e) The assessment afresh shall be made on its

own merits and in accordance with law.

f) The aforesaid exercise of assessment afresh

shall be completed as expeditiously as the business of the

respondent would permit, but in any event within two

months from 15.09.2021 i.e., on or before 15.11.2021.

Writ petition is disposed of on above terms. Consequently,

WMP is also closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

25.08.2021 Index: Yes/no Internet: Yes/No gpa

http://www.judis.nic.in

W.P.No.17492 of 2021

M.SUNDAR.J.,

gpa

To The Commercial Tax Officer (ST) (State Tax Officer) Chidambaram-1

W.P.No.17492 of 2021& W.M.P.No.18584 of 2021

25.08.2021

http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter