Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S.Sengamala Thayar ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 17335 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17335 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2021

Madras High Court
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S.Sengamala Thayar ... on 24 August, 2021
                                                                           T.C.A.Nos.955 to 958 of 2013

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 24.08.2021

                                                     CORAM :

                                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
                                                       AND
                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

                                            T.C.A.Nos.955 to 958 of 2013

                  Commissioner of Income Tax,
                  Central Circle,
                  Chennai.                                                   ... Appellant
                                                                                 in all appeals
                                                        Vs.


                  M/s.Sengamala Thayar Educational Trust,
                  No.1, Main Road,
                  Sundarakottai Post,
                  Mannargudi.                                                ... Respondent
                                                                                 in all appeals

                            Tax Case Appeals in T.C.A.Nos.955 to 958 of 2013 preferred under
                  Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income
                  Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, “C” Bench, dated 04.04.2013 in
                  I.T.A.Nos.1813/Mds/2010,         1814/Mds/2010,      1815/Mds/2010              and
                  1816/Mds/2010, respectively for the Assessment Years 1999-2000, 2001-02,
                  2002-03 and 2003-04 respectively.


                  Page 1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                 T.C.A.Nos.955 to 958 of 2013

                            For Appellant          : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar
                                                    Senior Standing Counsel
                                                    and Mrs.K.G.Usha Rani
                                                    Standing Counsel
                                                    in all appeals

                            For Respondent         : Mr.T.Vasudevan
                                                     in all appeals


                                              COMMON JUDGMENT
                                   (Judgment was delivered by T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)



                            We have heard Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, learned Senior Standing

                  Counsel and Mrs.K.G.Usha Rani, learned Standing Counsel for the

                  appellant/Revenue          and     Mr.T.Vasudevan,   learned      counsel      for     the

                  respondent/assessee.



                            2.The above appeals, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the

                  Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act), are directed against the order

                  dated 04.04.2013 made in I.T.A.Nos.1813/Mds/2010, 1814/Mds/2010,

                  1815/Mds/2010 and 1816/Mds/2010, on the file of the Income Tax Appellate

                  Tribunal, Madras, “C” Bench (for brevity, the Tribunal) for the Assessment

                  Years 1999-2000, 2001-02, 2002-03 and 2003-04 respectively.


                  Page 2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                             T.C.A.Nos.955 to 958 of 2013




                            3.The above appeals were admitted on 13.02.2014 on the following

                  substantial questions of law:

                                   “1.Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case,
                            the Tribunal was right in holding that the application seeking
                            for approval u/s.10(23C)(vi) filed before 13.07.2006 also have
                            to be disposed off within 12 months from the end of the month in
                            which the application was filed, while the Income Tax Act and
                            Explanatory Laws (Amendment) Act, 2006 specifically made the
                            condition applicable to the applications filed on or after
                            13.07.2006?


                                   2.Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the
                            Tribunal was right in holding that the approval u/s.10(23C)(vi)
                            is deemed to have been granted in the case of the assessee when
                            the application before DGIT has not been disposed off?”



                            4.The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant submits that

                  the above appeals are not pursued by the Revenue on account of the Low

                  Tax Effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the

                  Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary limit for

                  filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has been increased to Rs.1

                  Page 3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                             T.C.A.Nos.955 to 958 of 2013

                  crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in these cases is less than the

                  threshold limit.



                            5.In the light of the said submissions, the above Tax Case Appeals are

                  dismissed as withdrawn on account of the Low Tax Effect. The substantial

                  questions of law framed are left open. In the event the tax effect in these

                  cases is above the threshold limit fixed in the said Circular, liberty is

                  granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to restore the above

                  appeals to be heard and decided on merits. No costs.




                                                                      (T.S.S., J.)      (S.S.K., J.)
                                                                              24.08.2021
                                                                                  (1/4)

                  mkn

                  Internet : Yes
                  Index : Yes / No




                  To


                  Page 4/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                         T.C.A.Nos.955 to 958 of 2013



                  1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
                    Madras, “C” Bench.

                  2.The Commissioner of Income Tax,
                    Central Circle,
                    Chennai.




                  Page 5/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                     T.C.A.Nos.955 to 958 of 2013



                                                T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.

and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.

mkn

T.C.A.Nos.955 to 958 of 2013

24.08.2021 (1/4)

Page 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter