Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.Creamline Dairy Products Ltd vs M/S.S.V.Milk Dairy Farm
2021 Latest Caselaw 16949 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16949 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2021

Madras High Court
M/S.Creamline Dairy Products Ltd vs M/S.S.V.Milk Dairy Farm on 18 August, 2021
                                                                              C.S.No.901 of 2002

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 18.08.2021

                                                     CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

                                               C.S.No.901 of 2002
                                                      and
                                            O.A.Nos.904 to 906 of 2002

                      M/s.CREAMLINE DAIRY PRODUCTS LTD.,
                      1-11-252/11/1, Motilal Nagar,
                      Begumpet, Secunderabad – 500 016,
                      Rep. by its Director (Southern Operatons)
                      E.Nageshwar Rao                                            ...Plaintiff
                                                        .Vs.
                      M/s.S.V.MILK DAIRY FARM,
                      having Marketing Office at
                      10/958, Pachayappa Street,
                      Mogappair East,
                      Chennai – 600 050.                                         ... Defendant

                            Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Proceudre
                      read with Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules read with Sections
                      27, 105 and 106 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and read
                      with Section 55 and 62 of Copyright Act, 1957 praying for a judgment
                      and decree against the defendant granting:
                            a) permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its men, agents,
                      servants or any one claiming through him from in any manner infringing
                      the plaintiff's trade mark JERSEY along with the logo, colour scheme,

                      Page No.1/5
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                  C.S.No.901 of 2002

                      getup, layout, pattern, design, etc., by using the offending trade mark and
                      trade mark label 'ABINAYA' along with the identical and similar vertical
                      and horizontal lines, colour scheme, logo, getup, layout, pattern, design,
                      etc., or any other trade mark or label or logo which is identical or
                      deceptively similar to or a colourable imitation of the plaintiff's trade
                      mark and trade mark label JERSEY;
                            b) permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its men, agents,
                      servants or any one claiming through him from in any manner infringing
                      the plaintiff's copy right vested on the artistic work of the trade mark
                      JERSEY along with the logo, vertical and horizontal lines, colour scheme,
                      getup, layout, pattern, design, etc., by using the offending trade mark and
                      trade mark label 'ABINAYA' along with the identical and similar vertical
                      and horizontal lines colour scheme, logo, getup, layout, pattern, design,
                      etc., or any other trade mark or label or logo which is identical or
                      deceptively similar to or a colourable imitation of the plaintiff's copy right.
                            c) a    permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its men,
                      agents, servants, or any one claiming through him from in any manner
                      passing off its goods as that of the plaintiff's by using the offending trade
                      mark label 'ABINAYA' as and for those of the plaintiff's products or any
                      other trade mark label or logo which is similar or deceptively similar to
                      that of the plaintiff's trade mark JERSEY which includes the vertical and
                      horizontal lines, colour scheme, logo, getup, pattern, design etc., either by
                      manufacturing or offering for sale or in any manner advertising the same;
                            d) directing the defendant to surrender to the plaintiff the entire


                      Page No.2/5
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                    C.S.No.901 of 2002

                      stocks, with the infringing trade mark sachets 'ABINAYA' which is
                      similar and identical to the plaintiff's trade mark label JERSEY which
                      includes the vertical and horizontal lines, colour scheme, logo, getup,
                      pattern, design etc. and unused offending trade mark label 'ABINAYA'
                      together with blocks and dyes for destruction;
                             d) directing the defendant to render a true and faithful account of
                      the profits earned by them through the sale of their products bearing the
                      offending trade mark label 'ABINAYA' which is similar and identical to
                      plaintiff's trade mark label JERSEY which includes the vertical and
                      horizontal lines, colour scheme, logo, getup, pattern, design etc. and
                      directing the payment of such profits to the plaintiff and
                             e) directing the defendants to pay the costs of the suit to the
                      plaintiff.
                                    For Plaintiff       : Mr.Prasanna Venakt
                                                          for Mr.K.Ravindranath

                                                        ********

                                                  JUDGMENT

Mr.Prasanna Venakt, learned counsel representing

Mr.K.Ravindranath for the plaintiff would seek permission to withdraw

the suit.

2. Permission is granted and the suit is dismissed as withdrawn,

liberty is reserved to the plaintiff to sue if there is any subsequent cause of

action. No costs. Consequently, the connected original applications are

Page No.3/5 http://www.judis.nic.in C.S.No.901 of 2002

closed.


                                                                                    18.08.2021
                      dsa
                      Index      : No
                      Internet   : Yes
                      Non-speaking order


List of the witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff : Nil List of the witnesses examined on the side of the defendants: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the defendants : Nil

18.08.2021 dsa

Page No.4/5 http://www.judis.nic.in C.S.No.901 of 2002

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

dsa

C.S.No.901 of 2002

18.08.2021

Page No.5/5 http://www.judis.nic.in

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter