Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.R.Rajasekar (A) R.Murugan vs Rathina Devi
2021 Latest Caselaw 16946 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16946 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2021

Madras High Court
V.R.Rajasekar (A) R.Murugan vs Rathina Devi on 18 August, 2021
                                                                         A.S.No.293 of 2015

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 18.08.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

                                                A.S.No.293 of 2015
                                                       and
                                                 M.P.No.1 of 2015

                  V.R.Rajasekar (a) R.Murugan                              .. Appellant

                                                       Vs.


                  K.P.Madhanraj (Deceased)
                  1.Rathina devi
                  2.M.Vinod
                  3.M.Manoj Kumar
                  4.M.Jothi

                  D.S.P.Jerome (Deceased)

                  5.K.R.Vellaichamy
                  6.M.Thangaraj
                  7.R.Mohan
                  8.M.Prema
                  9.Regina
                  10.J.Robinson
                  11.J.Richardson                                    .. Respondents




                  1/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                    A.S.No.293 of 2015

                            Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set
                  aside the Judgment and decree dated 27.09.2012 made in O.S.No.12094 of 2010
                  on the file of the XV Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai.

                            For appellant     : Mr.A.E.Ravichandran

                            For respondents   : Mr.S.Pugalenthi (for R1 to R4)
                                                R5 to R11 given up



                                                      JUDGMENT

This first appeal is filed by the 6th defendant to set aside the Judgment

and decree dated 27.09.2012 made in O.S.No.12094 of 2010 on the file of the

XV Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel

appearing for the appellant Mr.A.E.Ravichandran as well as the learned counsel

appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 Mr.S.Pugalenthi would submit that the

disputes between the parties have been amicably settled and filed a joint memo

of compromise dated 11.02.2021. The joint compromise memo reads as

follows:-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ A.S.No.293 of 2015

"In pursuance to the above, the Appellant herein offered to pay sum of Rs.51,00,000/- to the respondents 2 to 4. Mother of the respondents also died on. Leaving behind the respondents 2 to 4 as her only legal heirs and already on record.

In pursuance to the same the Appellant herein (paid through the account of one Mr.Damodaran) has already paid a sum of Rs.51,00,000/- (Fifty one lakhs only) in the following manner. (1) Demand Draft bearing No.249092 for a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- drawn on corporation Bank, Rs.10,00,000/- on 18.11.2020 by RTGS No.UBINR 22020111800062096, Rs.7,00,000/- by RTGS UBINR No.2202112700124009 in all totalling 20,00,000/- in the name of Vinodh Kumar first respondent herein, (2) Demand Draft bearing No.249091 for a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- drawn on corporation bank, and Rs.10,00,000/- by way of RTGS on 23.03.2020 UTR No.Corpor 2202003240054-1925, Rs.5,00,000/- by RTGS No.UBINR NO.22020111800063504, Rs.2,00,000/- by RTGS No.UBINR No.22020112700124107 in all totalling Rs.20,00,000/- in the name of Manoj Kumar second respondent herein (3) and Rs.5,00,000/- (Five Lakhs only) by RTGS on 18.11.2020 and Rs.3,00,000/- by RTGS on 27.11.2020 vide UTR No.22020112700124041, Rs.3,00,000/- by way of cheque bearing No.760991 drawn on Union Bank India for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and by cash Rs.2,00,000/- to third respondent herein amounting to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ A.S.No.293 of 2015

Rs.11,00,000/- compromise memo is subject to honouring of cheque.

Whereas in consideration of the above amount paid by the appellant herein the respondents 2 to 4 herein confirm that they shall give up their rights in so far as the extent 1800 sqft is concerned and more fully described in the schedule hereunder and the appellant shall be at liberty to deal with the said schedule mentioned property alone as his own property.

The respondents 2 to 4 shall cooperate with the appellant in perfecting the title in so far as the extent of 1800 sqft, more fully stated in the schedule herein.

The appellant shall submit to the decree in view of the above settlement and shall not claim any right for any part of the balance property of the suit schedule mentioned property.

The appellant herein shall cooperate with the respondents 2 to 4 as and when required, in order to proceed with the execution of the Judgment and Decree for the balance portion of the suit schedule mentioned property.

The appellant herein admits that this compromise pertains to the extent of schedule mentioned property measuring 1800 sqft and has nothing to do with the balance portion covered under the decree of the Hon'ble XV fast Track court Judge, dated 27.09.2012 and the respondents shall be at liberty to proceed against the balance property in the Execution proceedings in E.P.No.1725 of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ A.S.No.293 of 2015

2013 on the file of the Hon'ble X Assistant Judge, Civil Court, Chennai.

The Appellants herein gives up his rights on Rs.5,00,000/- referred to in the Decree of the Hon'ble XV Fast Tract Court Judge, dated 27.09.2012 in O.S.No.12094 of 2010 and has absolutely no objections for the respondents / plaintiffs 2 to 4 to withdraw the amount of Rs.5,00,000/- available in the suit schedule in C.S.No.588 of 1997 on the file of the Hon'ble High Court. The appellant shall cooperate as and when required for withdrawal of the above said amount.

The respondents / plaintiffs 2 to 4 herein shall peacefully handover possession of the suit property and shall have no rights over the same and shall not make any claim in future in so far as the schedule mentioned portion herein.

Henceforth there shall be no claims or disputes as against each other whatsoever in any manner pertaining to the suit subject property.

This is the final settlement and the parties shall not henceforth disturb the other on the subject issue in future at any costs.

The cost of the proceedings shall be borne by the respective parties.

The above settlement has been arrived between the parties on their own volition/willingness without any force, threat,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ A.S.No.293 of 2015

coercion or undue influence from any quarter.

The settlement shall enforce strictly true to its spirit and intentions and no one shall deviate from the same"

3.In the light of the above mentioned facts, this appeal is disposed of in

terms of the compromise memo dated 11.02.2021. The Joint Memo of

Compromise shall form part of the Decree. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.

18.08.2021 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No skn

To

1. The XV Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai.

3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ A.S.No.293 of 2015

K.KALYANASUNDARAM., J skn

A.S.No.293 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015

18.08.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter