Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.Senthamil Selvi vs The Chief Manager
2021 Latest Caselaw 16918 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16918 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2021

Madras High Court
P.Senthamil Selvi vs The Chief Manager on 18 August, 2021
                                                                        W.P.No.7637 of 2021



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED:    18.08.2021

                                                     CORAM :

                                   THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                         AND
                                     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU


                                                W.P.No.7637 of 2021

                     P.Senthamil Selvi                                  .. Petitioner

                                                         Vs


                     1.The Chief Manager,
                       Indian Bank, (ARM Branch),
                       Puliyakulam (Customs),
                       Coimbatore – 641 018.

                     2.M/s.Srivari Enterprises,
                       Office 1: No.11/15A SRP Nagar,
                       2nd Cross, Saibaba Colony,
                       Coimbatore.

                     3.Madhangopal

                     4.Mahalakshmi

                     5.Prem Chander                                     .. Respondents

                         (Respondent Nos.2 to 5 impleaded as per the
                          order dated 24.03.2021)




                     __________
                     Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                 W.P.No.7637 of 2021



                     Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
                     issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to
                     implement the terms of the confirmation letter dated 03.02.2020 by
                     executing the sale deed of the auctioned securities immovable
                     properties comprised in G.S.No.41, Old T.S.No.9/5/1 Part, New
                     T.S.No.9/4/3 Part, Coimbatore Town Municipal Ward Old No.9, New
                     No.5, Ram Nagar, East West Cross Road, Ponne Gowder Road at
                     Anuparpalayam Village, Coimbatore in an extent of 4821 sq. ft. or 11
                     cents 25 sq. ft. of land and RCC building in that western half portion of
                     property with an extent of 2410 sq. ft. or 5 ½ cents land with door
                     numbers 581, 582, 584 and 585 in the petitioner's favour and to put
                     the petitioner in vacant and immediate possession of the said property
                     by the first respondent after execution of the sale deed and comply
                     with the request of the petitioner in accordance with the petitioner's
                     representation dated 19.2.2021.


                                      For Petitioner           : Mr.V.Lakshminarayanan
                                                                 for M/s.R.Vasudevan

                                      For Respondents          : Ms.S.R.Sumathy
                                                                 for respondent No.1

                                                               : Mr.K.J.Parthasarathy
                                                                 for respondent No.3

                                                               : R2, R4 and R5
                                                                 No Appearance

                                                           ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)

The grievance of the petitioner, a successful auction-purchaser

at a sale conducted by the respondent secured creditor under the

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.7637 of 2021

of Security Interest Act, 2002, is that despite a marginal delay in

depositing the balance consideration on account of the difficulties faced

during the lockdown, the secured creditor says that the sale can no

longer be concluded in the petitioner's favour.

2. In certain other matters wherein the same issue had arisen, in

view of the difficulties faced during the lockdown, this court had

permitted the balance payment to be accepted by the secured

creditors upon interest at the rate of 10 per cent per annum being

directed to be paid. The provision for interest was made as the

secured creditors indicated that, in terms of Rule 9 of the Security

Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, the secured creditor had no

authority to extend the time for the balance consideration to be put in

by the auction-purchaser beyond 90 days from the date of the auction.

3. In this case, the borrower is represented and the borrower

relies on a judgment reported at (2018) 1 SCC 626 (Agarwal Tracom

Private Limited v. Punjab National Bank). Such judgment instructs

that even the issue as to whether the money deposited by the auction-

purchaser may be forfeited can be taken up by the appropriate tribunal

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.7637 of 2021

under Section 17 of the Act of 2002.

4. Section 17 of the Act contains wide words and permits any

person aggrieved by any measure adopted by a secured creditor to

carry a grievance to the jurisdictional Debts Recovery Tribunal. There

is no doubt that the sale of a property or anything done in connection

therewith pertains to a measure under Section 13(4) of the Act. In

view of the said judgment, the petitioner is permitted to approach the

appropriate Debts Recovery Tribunal for the grievance contained in the

petition.

5. W.P.No.7637 of 2021 is disposed of without going into the

further merits of the matter.

There will be no order as to costs.

                                                                     (S.B., CJ.)      (P.D.A., J.)
                                                                               18.08.2021
                     Index : No
                     bbr

                     To:

                     __________



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.7637 of 2021

The Chief Manager, Indian Bank, (ARM Branch), Puliyakulam (Customs), Coimbatore – 641 018.

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P.No.7637 of 2021

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

bbr

W.P.No.7637 of 2021

18.08.2021

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter