Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arulmigu Mariamman Temple vs The Commissioner
2021 Latest Caselaw 16256 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16256 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2021

Madras High Court
Arulmigu Mariamman Temple vs The Commissioner on 10 August, 2021
                                                                             W.A.No.1511 of 2021

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 10.08.2021

                                                        CORAM

                                      THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
                                                       and
                                      THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL

                                                W.A.No.1511 of 2021
                                              and C.M.P.No.9628 of 2021

                     Arulmigu Mariamman Temple,
                     Rep. by its
                     Chairman of Hereditary Trustee,
                     C.R.Thirupathi Gounder,
                     S/o.Chinnapaiyan @ Ramasamy,
                     Avadhanapatti Village, Agraharam Post,
                     Krishnagiri Taluk & District.                                  .. Appellant

                                                          Vs

                     1.The Commissioner,
                       HR & CE Department,
                       Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
                       Nungambakkam,
                       Chennai - 600 034.

                     2.The Joint Commissioner,
                       HR & CE Department,
                       Salem.

                     3.The Assistant Commissioner,
                       HR & CE Department,
                       Dharmapuri.                                              .. Respondents

                               Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order

                     dated 25.01.2019 made in W.P.No.31685 of 2018.


                     Page 1 of 9


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                W.A.No.1511 of 2021



                               For Appellant             :     Mr.E.Om Prakash, Sr.Counsel
                                                               for Mr.C.Samivel

                               For Respondents           :     Mr.D.Ravichander,
                                                               Government Counsel


                                                       JUDGMENT

(Delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)

The appeal lies on a very narrow compass. The appellant laid a

challenge to the appointment of the Executive Officer by filing a writ

petition in W.P.No.31685 of 2018. The aforesaid writ petition was

disposed of by taking note of the order passed in W.P.No.27863 of

2018, by which, a direction was issued to consider the representation

dated 14.09.2018 which is to approve the resolution for appointment

of the Chairman. The following is the order passed by the learned

Single Judge:-

"2.The learned Special Government Pleader (HR&CE) submitted that this Court today passed an order in W.P.No.30479 of 2018 directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.09.2018 seeking to approve the resolution No.36 passed by the Hereditary Trustees on merits.

3.Heard both sides.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1511 of 2021

4. Admittedly, this Court directed the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.09.2018 seeking to approve the resolution No.36 passed by the Hereditary Trustees on merits and in accordance with law. It is submitted that though this Court passed an order of status quo in W.P.No.27863 of 2018, pursuant to the dismissal of the said writ petition on 22.11.2018, the impugned order was implemented. Hence, subject to the orders to be passed by the second respondent on the representation dated 14.09.2018, it is open to the petitioner to take any action in the manner known to law.

5.With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed."

2. Thereafter, the said representation made, as directed in

W.P.No.27863 of 2018, has been considered and rejected, against

which, a writ petition was filed in W.P.No.34161 of 2019.

3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted

that the subject matter of the writ petition in W.P.No.27863 of 2018

and the order passed thereunder is totally different. In any case, the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1511 of 2021

order of rejection passed has been challenged in W.P.No.34161 of

2019. Therefore, the order of the learned Single Judge requires

interference.

4. Learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents

submitted that in view of the disputed questions of fact and the

impugned order having been passed in the year 2018, no interference

is required with the order passed by the learned Single Judge since

liberty is also given to the appellant to take any action in the manner

known to law awaiting the decision of the authorities as directed in

W.P.No.27863 of 2018.

5. We find considerable force in the submission made by the

learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant apart from the fact

that the subject matter of the writ petition under challenge is being

different and distinct than the one dealt with in W.P.No.27863 of 2018.

Even the said representation directed to be considered has been

rejected resulting in the subsequent writ petition in W.P.No.34161 of

2019.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1511 of 2021

6. In such view of the matter, the order dated 03.10.2018

passed by the second respondent will have to be tested on merit.

7. Accordingly, the order of the learned Single Judge is set aside

and the W.P.No.31685 of 2018 stands restored to be tried along with

W.P.No.34161 of 2019.

8. The writ appeal stands ordered accordingly. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                                     (M.M.S., J.)    (S.K., J.)
                                                                             10.08.2021
                     Index:Yes/No
                     mmi/ssm







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1511 of 2021

W.A.No.1511 of 2021

M.M.SUNDRESH, J.

and S.KANNAMMAL, J.

(Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)

This matter is listed today under the caption 'for being

mentioned' at the instance of the learned senior counsel for the

appellant.

2.It is submitted by the learned senior counsel for the appellant

that by oversight, a wrong representation has been made as if writ

petition filed in W.P.No.34161 of 2019 is pending. In fact, the correct

number is W.P.No.13 of 2020, which has already been disposed of and

therefore, the order requires modification to that extent.

3.The aforesaid factual submission is not disputed by the other

side.

4.In such view of the matter, the order dated 10.08.2021 is

modified to the effect that the connected writ petition is not

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1511 of 2021

M.M.SUNDRESH,J.

and S.KANNAMMAL,J.

mmi

W.P.No.34161 of 2019 but W.P.No.13 of 2020, which has also been

disposed of. Thus, the pending writ petition in W.P.No.31685 of 2018,

as directed to be restored, will have to be decided in accordance with

law and therefore, a direction to try it along with W.P.No.34161 of

2019 stands modified.

                                                               (M.M.S., J.)    (S.K., J.)
                                                                       25.08.2021

                     mmi/ssm

Note: Registry is directed to issue corrected order copy

W.A.No.1511 of 2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1511 of 2021

To

1.The Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.

2.The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Salem.

3.The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Dharmapuri.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.A.No.1511 of 2021

M.M.SUNDRESH,J.

and S.KANNAMMAL,J.

mmi

W.A.No.1511 of 2021

10.08.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter