Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tamil Nadu State Transport ... vs M.Muneeswari : 1St
2021 Latest Caselaw 16018 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16018 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2021

Madras High Court
Tamil Nadu State Transport ... vs M.Muneeswari : 1St on 6 August, 2021
                                                                            C.M.A(MD)No.637 of 2021

                             BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED : 06.08.2021

                                                      CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

                         C.M.A(MD)Nos.637, 638, 639, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645 of 2021
                                                      and
                        C.M.P.(MD)Nos.6131, 6132, 6136, 6180, 6181, 6182, 6184, 6191, 6192,
                                                  6193 of 2021

                     C.M.A.(MD)Nos.637 of 2021 :

                     Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited,
                     Represented by its Managing Director,
                     Ramanathapuram.                       : Appellant /1st Respondent

                                                    Vs.

                     1.M.Muneeswari                        : 1st Respondent/ Claimant

                     2.S.Devasahayam

                     3.Sriram General Insurance Company Limited,
                      Represented through its Manager,
                      E-8, RIICO Industrial Area, Sitapura,
                      Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302 022. : Respondents 2 & 3/Respondents 2 & 3

                     PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
                     Vehicle Act, 1988, to set aside the impugned award passed in M.C.O.P.No.
                     381 of 2015, dated 21.10.2019 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims
                     Tribunal/Ist Additional District Court, Thoothukudi.
                                   (in all petitions)
                                   For Appellant : Mr.Vishnuvarthanan


                     1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                            C.M.A(MD)No.637 of 2021

                                                  COMMON JUDGMENT


                               These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are directed against the common

                     award dated 21.10.2019 passed in M.C.O.P.Nos. 381, 382, 383, 385, 543,

                     544, 545, 546, 557 of 2015 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims

                     Tribunal/I Additional District Court, Tuticorin,



                               2.The appellant/Transport Corporation, who was made liable to pay

                     compensation of Rs.25,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum to each of the

                     claimants, who suffered injuries in an accident occurred on 08.03.2015,

                     challenged the liability mulcted on it and the quantum of compensation

                     awarded by the Tribunal.



                               3. The case of the claimants is that while they were travelling in the

                     van bearing Registration No. TN 67 W 6619 owned by the second

                     respondent on 08.03.2015 at about 06.00 am, a Bus owned by the appellant

                     Corporation bearing Registration No. TN 72 N 1535, came from south to

                     north in Tuticorin – Tharuvaikulam Road nearby Thomaspuram, in a rash

                     and negligent manner and dashed against the van, as a result of which, a

                     lady travelled in the bus and the claimants travelled in the van had sustained


                     2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                         C.M.A(MD)No.637 of 2021

                     injuries and that the accident was occurred only due to the rash and

                     negligent driving of the bus driver.

                               4.It is not in dispute that a lady passenger Mahalakshmi, who

                     travelled in the bus along with her husband had sustained serious injuries

                     and subsequently succumbed to the injuries. The legal heirs of the deceased

                     Mahalakshmi have laid a claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.380 of 2015. It is

                     evident that the other injured persons, who were travelling in the van have

                     filed the claim petitions in M.C.O.P.Nos. 381, 382, 383, 385, 543, 544, 545,

                     546, 557 of 2015. Since all the claim petitions relate to the accident

                     occurred on 08.03.2015, the Tribunal has conducted joint enquiry by

                     recording the evidence in MCOP.No.380 of 2015 and the Tribunal on

                     perusing the evidence adduced and on hearing the arguments of both sides,

                     has passed the impugned common award holding that the accident was

                     occurred only due to the rash and negligent driving of the bus driver,

                     directed the Transport Corporation to pay compensation to the claimants.

                     Aggrieved by the said award, the Transport Corporation has preferred the

                     above appeals and the appeal in CMA.N0.636 of 2021. After hearing the

                     learned counsel for the appellant, this Court has admitted the appeal in

                     CMA.(MD)No.636 of 2021 and ordered issuance of notice to the

                     respondents therein.


                     3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                             C.M.A(MD)No.637 of 2021



                               5.Though the appellant in the memorandum of the appeal has

                     challenged the finding of the Tribunal with respect to the negligence aspect,

                     the same was not pressed into service before this Court. The learned counsel

                     for the appellant would submit that they have only challenged the quantum

                     of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.



                               6.As already pointed out, the Tribunal has awarded compensation of

                     Rs.25,000/- each to the injured claimants and the same are now under

                     challenge.



                               7. It is evident from the records that all the injured claimants of the

                     nine cases along with the first petitioner/husband of the deceased

                     Mahalakshmi (CMA.(MD)No.636 of 2021) have given evidence before the

                     Tribunal. The claimants of the above nine cases have produced the medical

                     records to show that they have suffered injuries and that they have taken

                     treatment. It is further evident from the records that the claimants in

                     MCOP.No.544 and 545 of 2015 have produced the accident register extract

                     issued by the Saint Heart American Hospital, Tuticorin and other claimants

                     have produced the Accident Register/Discharge Certificate issued by the


                     4/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                             C.M.A(MD)No.637 of 2021

                     Government Hospitals. P.W.2 to P.W.10, the claimants have given evidence

                     before the Tribunal reiterating the petitions' contentions that they have

                     suffered injuries and that they have taken treatment.



                               8.Considering the nature of injuries and consequent treatment taken,

                     pain and sufferings of the claimants, the Tribunal has awarded a lump sum

                     amount of Rs.25,000/- along with interest at 7.5% per annum to the each of

                     the injured claimants and as such, the amount awarded by the Tribunal

                     cannot said to be excessive.



                               9.The appellant has not advanced or canvassed any other ground to

                     impugn the award. Hence, this Court decides that the appeals are devoid of

                     merits and as such, this Court is not inclined to admit the appeals.



                               10.In the result, these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed. No

                     costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.



                                                                                 06.08.2021


                     Index : Yes : No
                     Internet : Yes : No
                     das

                     5/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                       C.M.A(MD)No.637 of 2021




                                                                     K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

das

To

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/ Ist Additional District Court, Thoothukudi.

2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

C.M.A(MD)Nos.637, 638, 639, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.6131, 6132, 6136, 6180, 6181, 6182, 6184, 6191, 6192, 6193 of 2021

06.08.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter