Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mrs.Sangeetha Jain vs M/S.Vantage Leathers India Ltd
2021 Latest Caselaw 15655 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15655 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2021

Madras High Court
Mrs.Sangeetha Jain vs M/S.Vantage Leathers India Ltd on 4 August, 2021
                                                                                   C.S.No.665 of 2006

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 04.08.2021

                                           CORAM : JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

                                                     C.S.No.665 of 2006

                     1.Mrs.Sangeetha Jain
                     2.Anil Kumar Jain
                     3.Sandeep Jain                                          ...   Plaintiffs

                                                             Vs.


                     1.M/s.Vantage Leathers India Ltd.,
                       rep. by its Managing Director,
                       Mr.K.Venkatasubramanian
                       No.8 & 9, Halls Road,
                       Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

                     2.K.Venkatasubramanian
                     3.P.R.Sethuprakasam
                     4.Mrs.N.Sumathi
                     5.Mrs.S.Sengamalam
                     6.V.K.Jain
                     7.Indian Bank,
                       rep. by its General Manager,
                       No.31, Rajaji Salai.,
                       Chennai - 600 001.                                  ...      Defendants


                     PRAYER : Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules, read
                     with Order VII, Rule 1 of CPC, 1908:


                                    A) For a declaration that the plaintiffs are the bonafide


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/5
                                                                                    C.S.No.665 of 2006

                                      purchasers for value of the suit property situate at Plot
                                      Nos.19 and 22, New Branch Road, Thiruvanmiyur,
                                      Chennai - 600 041, Thiruvanmiyur Village, Mylapore-
                                      Triplicane Taluk, Chennai District, comprised in old
                                      Survey Nos.213/2 and 213/3, present T.S.No.314,
                                      Block No.65, measuring an extent of 3.56 grounds or
                                      thereabout, more fully described in suit schedule
                                      mentioned property;
                                   B) For a declaration that the alleged equitable mortgage
                                      purported to have been created by the defendants 1 to 5
                                      in favour of 7th defendant on 7/8.11.1998 or 04.4.2000
                                      in respect of the suit property situate at Plot Nos.19 and
                                      22, New Beach road, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai - 600
                                      041, Thiruvanmiyur Village, Mylapore - Triplicane
                                      Taluk, Chennai District, comprised in old Survey
                                      Nos.213/2 and 213/3, present T.S.No.314, Block
                                      No.65, measuring an extent of 3.56 grounds or
                                      thereabout, more fully described in suit schedule
                                      mentioned property is illegal, invalid and non-est in the
                                      eye of law.
                                   C) For a declaration that the impugned notice dated
                                      28.7.2006 issued by the 7th Defendant in respect of the
                                      suit schedule mentioned property Plot No.19 and Plot
                                      No.22 is illegal, invaild and non-est in the eye of law
                                      and declare the same as void abinitio in so far as the
                                      Plaintiffs and their properties are concerned morefully

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     2/5
                                                                                  C.S.No.665 of 2006

                                      described hereunder;
                                   D) For a permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1
                                      to 7, their men, agents, servants or any other person or
                                      persons authorized by them or claiming through them
                                      from interfering with the peaceful possession and
                                      enjoyment of the suit property situate at Plots Nos.19
                                      and 22, New Beach Road, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai -
                                      600 041, Thiruvanmiyur Village, Mylapore-Triplicane
                                      Taluk, Chennai comprised in old Survey Nos.213/2 and
                                      213/3, present T.S.No.314, Block No.65, measuring an
                                      extent of 3.56 grounds or thereabout, more fully
                                      described    in suit schedule mentioned property,
                                      pursuant to the proceedings initiated as against the
                                      defendants 1 to 5 and the plaintiffs in O.A.No.527 of
                                      2002 on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal-1,
                                      Chennai or under the provisions of the Securitisation &
                                      Debts Recovery Law, except in accordance with law.
                                   E) Granting such other relief or reliefs
                                   F) for costs of the suit.


                                       For Plaintiff        : Mrs.Vasudha Thiagarajan
                                       For D1 to D5         : Mr.K.Ravindranath

                                                  JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the plaintiffs submitted that the dispute has been

amicably resolved between the parties and further, sought the leave of the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.S.No.665 of 2006

Court to withdraw this suit.

2.In view of the above, this Civil Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No

costs.

3.The learned counsel for the plaintiffs made a statement that the

plaintiffs are from New Delhi and in these times of Covid-19 it would be

riskier for them to travel from New Delhi to Chennai for collecting the

Court fee and sought the leave of the Court to collect the Court fee on

behalf of the plaintiffs.

4.The learned counsel for the plaintiffs is permitted to collect the Court

fee on behalf of the plaintiffs.

04.08.2021

Tsg

Index : Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

C.S.No.665 of 2006

N.SESHASAYEE.J.,

Tsg

C.S.No.665 of 2006

04.08.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter