Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramakrishna Perumal vs Kottar Senguntha Mudaliar
2021 Latest Caselaw 9961 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9961 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 April, 2021

Madras High Court
Ramakrishna Perumal vs Kottar Senguntha Mudaliar on 19 April, 2021
                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                             Dated : 19.04.2021

                                                   CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                                         SA(MD)Nos.800 & 801 of 2014
                                                    and
                                           MP(MD)Nos.2 & 2 of 2014

                Ramakrishna Perumal                  ... Appellant/Respondent/Defendant
                                                                in both appeals
                                                     Vs.
                1.Kottar Senguntha Mudaliar
                          Samudhaya Oor Vakai
                   Sri Sentra Thisai Vendra Vinayagar
                          Swamy Trust,
                  rep.by its Trustees P.Pazhaniyandi Mudaliar


                2.M.Valliyanantham Mudaliar
                3.P.Rajavel Mudaliar
                4.S.Lekshmanan Mudaliar
                5.R.Sivakumaran Mudaliar
                6.S.Retnaswamy Mudaliar
                7.P.Azhagesan Mudaliar                        ...Respondents 1 to 7 /
                                                                   Appellants 1 to 7 /
                                                                   Defendants 1 to 7


                8.Madasamy Mudaliar                           ...8th Respondent /
                                                              2nd Respondent /
                                                              8th Defendant

                1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                Common Prayer: Second Appeals are filed under Section 100 of Civil
                Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to the judgment and
                decree dated 28.01.2014 made in A.S No.86 of 2013 & 92 of 2013 on
                the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Nagercoil reversing the
                judgment and decree dated 12.04.2013 made in O.S No.177 of 2006 &
                413 of 2005, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court,
                Nagercoil, set aside the same.


                in both cases :
                          For Appellant          : Mr.EVN.Siva
                          For Respondents        : Mr.M.P.Senthil




                                             COMMON JUDGEMENT

                          The appellant in these two Second Appeals is one Ramakrishna

                Perumal. The first respondent in both the appeals is Kottar Senguntha

                Mudaliar Samudhaya Oor Vakai Sri Sentra Thisai Vendra Vinayagar

                Swamy Trust. The trust is the landlord while Ramakrishna Perumal is

                the tenant. O.S No.413 of 2005 was filed by the landlord along with

                others for recovery of possession and for recovery of rental arrears. O.S

                No.177 of 2006 was filed by the tenant seeking permission to deposit

                the monthly rent.         Both the suits were tried together. While the suit

                filed by the landlord was dismissed, the suit filed by the tenant was


                2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                decreed vide judgment and decree dated 12.04.2013 on the file of the

                Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil.               Aggrieved by the same, the

                landlord filed A.S Nos.92 of 2013 and 86 of 2013 before the Sub Court,

                Nagercoil.            The first appellate court vide the impugned judgment dated

                28.01.2014 allowed the appeals.                Aggrieved by the same, these two

                Second Appeals have been filed. The Second Appeals were admitted on

                the following substantial questions of law :

                                        “1.Whether the finding of the first appellate court that
                                   Ex.A1 quit notice, is valid in law and is in accordance with
                                   Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act ? and
                                        2.Whether the finding with regard to Ex.A1 by the first
                                   appellate court, is perverse by misreading of the evidence
                                   adduced ?.”



                          2.During the pendency of the second appeals, certain subsequent

                developments took place.                The tenant appears to have sublet the

                premises. The sub-lessee had cleared the liability of the appellant. The

                landlord has also entered into a fresh rental agreement with the

                erstwhile sub-lessee.            This submission is made by the learned counsel

                for the landlord. This development was also duly recorded in E.P No.35

                of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil. In

                view of the subsequent development, nothing survives for further


                3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                adjudication in these second appeals.         The second appeals are

                accordingly closed.    No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are

                also closed.

                                                                        19.04.2021

                Index    : Yes / No
                Internet : Yes/ No
                skm

                Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19
                pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official
                purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is
                presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the
                advocate/litigant concerned.

                To

                1.The Principal Subordinate Court, Nagercoil.
                2.The Principal District Munsif Court, Nagercoil.


                Copy to :
                The Record Keeper, V.R.Section,
                Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai.




                4/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                         G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

skm

SA(MD)Nos.800 & 801 of 2014 and MP(MD)Nos.2 & 2 of 2014

19.04.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter