Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Durai Srinivasan vs Sree Gokulam Chit And Finance ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 9570 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9570 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 April, 2021

Madras High Court
Durai Srinivasan vs Sree Gokulam Chit And Finance ... on 15 April, 2021
                                                                              CRL.O.P.No.7038 of 2021


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED : 15.04.2021

                                                       CORAM:

                                   THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

                                                CRL.O.P.No.7038 of 2021


                     Durai Srinivasan                                            ... Petitioner

                                                       Versus

                     Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt.Ltd.,
                     Rep.by its Business Manager and Law Officer
                     6/7, V.R.Complex Mothilal Street,
                     Tiruvallur Town and District.                             ... Respondent


                     PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the

                     Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the learned Fast Track Judge

                     (Magistrate Level) Tiruvallur to recall the non-bailable warrant issued

                     against the petitioner in C.C.No.24 of 2014.


                                      For Petitioner   :     Mr.S.Gowrishankar

                                      For Respondent   :     Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz,
                                                             Additional Public Prosecutor


                     Page No.1 of 8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                  CRL.O.P.No.7038 of 2021




                                                          ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the

learned Fast Track Judge (Magistrate Level) Tiruvallur to recall the non-

bailable warrant issued against the petitioner in C.C.No.24 of 2014.

2. The petitioner, who is the sole accused in C.C.Nos.24, 27

& 34 of 2014 which are pending before the Fast Track Judge (Magistrate

Level) Tiruvallur, had filed this petition seeking a direction to recall the

Non-bailable Warrant issued against the petitioner in C.C.No.24 of 2014.

NBW, which was issued on 30.12.2020.

3. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a

aged person and he is very near to Arakonam. However, his appearance

before the trial court was dispensed with and the Advocate has also not

appeared before the trial Court. He also submitted that quash petitions

were filed before this Court in Crl.O.P.Nos.19312 to 19314 of 2014.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No.7038 of 2021

This Court by the order dated 12.12.2020 has disposed of the Criminal

Original Petitions to quash and dispensed with the appearance of the

accused. On 30.12.2020, the complainant was absent before the trial

court and petition under Section 256 of Cr.P.C., was filed and allowed.

Appearance of the accused dispensed with. No representation on behalf

of him. As per the order dated 12.12.2020, this Court directed to expedite

the trial and complete the same as early as possible and also ordered that

the order will not stand on the way of the trial Court to insist for the

appearance of the petitioner for receiving copies under Section 207 of

Cr.P.C., framing of charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C and

judgment and as and when the trial Court feels it necessary. In view of

the same, the petitioner contention is that due to Covid-19, he was unable

to contact his counsel and hence, he was not aware of the hearing date

and hence, he has not appeared before the trial Court and the trial Court

had issued Non-Bailable Warrant against him on 30.12.2020 and hence,

filed the above Criminal Original Petition for recalling the said Non-

Bailable Warrant.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No.7038 of 2021

4. The contention of the respondent/complainant is a chit

and a Finance Company, the petitioner approached him and he

subsequently had taken a chit amount and for the interest and liability, he

had issued cheques and the cheques got dishonored. Now, after receiving

the entire chit amount, for the discharge of his liability, cheques were

given, however, the accused conveniently closed his account. Thereafter,

statutory notice was issued and an untenable reply was received from the

accused. The Calender Case is of the year 2013 and for the past 7 years,

the case has been kept in pending for one reason or other.

5. Considering the submission and on a perusal of the

materials, it is seen that the Calender Case is of the year 2013 and the

case is pending before the Fast Track Judge (Magistrate Level)

Thiruvallur for more than 7 years. The petitioner had filed the quash

petition in the year 2014 and which was disposed of certain directions

and since the case was periodically adjourned before the trial Court,

finally, the petition was disposed of on 12.12.2020, and thereafter the

trial Court, on 30.12.2020, recorded the observations of this Court in the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No.7038 of 2021

quash petition. The respondent/complainant was ready before the trial

Court along with the proof affidavit and no one represented the accused

before the trial Court and the learned counsel for the accused was not

present. Since both of them were not available, thereafter, notice was

taken to the petitioner for his appearance and the petitioner has not

received the notice and the notice was returned as “unclaimed.” After

giving several adjournments, the trial Court issued NBW against the

accused. The trial Court is empowered to issue NBW so that the trial

Court can be progress and the accused can be produced before the trial

Court. Either the accused or his counsel should participate in the trial

and if both of them have not appeared before the trial Court, the trial

Court has got powers to issue NBW, and in this case, after issuance of

notice, and thereafter only, NBW was issued.

6. In view of the same, this Court finds that the issuance of

NBW is absolutely right. The prayer sought for by the petitioner has to

be granted only by the trial Court taking into consideration of the case

and not by this Court. Without approaching the trial Court, the petitioner

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No.7038 of 2021

has approached this Court and at this stage, this Court is not inclined to

entertain the petition.

7. Therefore, the counsel for the petitioner sought

permission to withdraw the petition. Hence, permission is granted. With

the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as

withdrawn. It is open to the petitioner to approach the trial Court for his

remedy to recall the NBW.

15.04.2021

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No dna

Note: Issue order copy on 16.04.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No.7038 of 2021

To

1.The Fast Track Judge (Magistrate Level) Tiruvallur.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No.7038 of 2021

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

dna

CRL.O.P.No.7038 of 2021

15.04.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ CRL.O.P.No.7038 of 2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter