Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maduranthagi Natchiyar vs The Special Commissioner &
2021 Latest Caselaw 9207 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9207 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2021

Madras High Court
Maduranthagi Natchiyar vs The Special Commissioner & on 7 April, 2021
                                                     W.A.Nos.1705 & 1706 of 2017

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                          DATED: 07.04.2021

                                   CORAM

           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
                         AND
      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                     W.A.Nos.1705 & 1706 of 2017

Maduranthagi Natchiyar
D/o Karthikeyaraja            ..      Appellant in both the Writ Appeals

                                    -vs-

01. The Special Commissioner &
     Commissioner of Land Administration
    Chepauk
    Chennai 600 005

02. The Director of Survey & Settlements
    Chennai 600 005

03. The Land Settlement Officer
    Thanjavur

04. The Assistant Land Settlement Officer
    Madurai

05. The District Forest Officer
    Ramnad-cum-P.M.T.Forest Division
    Sivagangai 630 501

06. Raghuraj
07. Rajalakshmi
08. Mahesh
09. Tmt.Banumathi Natchiyar
10. N.Lakshmi Priya

1/5
                                                       W.A.Nos.1705 & 1706 of 2017

11. Minor Akila Nagendiran
12. Minor Sai Sivam
    (Minors 11 & 12 rep.by natural
     guardian N.Lakshmi Priya
     Wife of deceased Nagendran .. Respondents in both the Writ Appeals

      Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order
dated 25.01.2017 made in W.P.Nos.384 & 686 of 2011.

             For Appellant             ::     No appearance

             For Respondents           ::     Mr.K.Magesh
                                              Special Government Pleader
                                              for R1 to 4
                                              Mr.S.Prabhu
                                              Additional Government
                                              Pleader (Forest) for R5
                                              No appearance for R6 to 12

                              JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.RAJA, J.)

No one appeared for the appellant.

2. Learned Additional Government Pleader (Forest) appearing for the

fifth respondent, placing on record the order of the Hon'ble Division Bench

dated 2.11.2012 passed in Writ Appeal No.2327 of 2012, stated that since

the issue raised in the present writ appeals in respect of the land in question

has already been decided by the Hon'ble Division Bench in the

aforementioned writ appeal, nothing survives in the present writ appeals.

Secondly, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the

W.A.Nos.1705 & 1706 of 2017

fifth respondent, referring to the order passed by the learned single Judge

impugned before us, also stated that the learned single Judge also, relying

heavily upon the order dated 17.4.2012 passed in Writ Petition No.36216 of

2003, has dismissed the Writ Petition Nos.384 & 686 of 2011 by the order

dated 25.1.2017. Since the order dated 17.4.2012 passed in Writ Petition

No.36216 of 2003 relied upon by the learned single Judge also, has been

confirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench vide order dated 2.11.2012

passed in Writ Appeal No.2327 of 2012, nothing survives in the present

writ appeals.

3. We have also perused paragraphs 24, 25 & 26 of the order dated

17.4.2012 passed in Writ Petition No.36216 of 2003 that have been referred

to and relied upon by the learned single Judge while dismissing the Writ

Petition Nos.384 & 686 of 2011 vide the impugned order dated 25.1.2017.

When the order dated 17.4.2012 passed in Writ Petition No.36216 of 2003

was confirmed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in Writ Appeal No.2327 of

2012 dated 2.11.2012, as rightly canvassed by the learned Additional

Government Pleader appearing for the fifth respondent, we are able to see

that the issue raised in the present writ appeals in respect of the land in

question is no longer res integra, as the same has already been decided.

W.A.Nos.1705 & 1706 of 2017

Therefore, when both the issue and the subject matter of the land in

question raised in the present writ appeals were already considered,

following the order dated 2.11.2012 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench

in Writ Appeal No.2327 of 2012, both the writ appeals fail and they are

dismissed. No costs.



Speaking/Non speaking order                (T.R.,J.)       (G.K.I.,J.)
Index : yes/no                                    07.04.2021

ss


To

1. The Special Commissioner &

Commissioner of Land Administration Chepauk Chennai 600 005

2. The Director of Survey & Settlements Chennai 600 005

3. The Land Settlement Officer Thanjavur

4. The Assistant Land Settlement Officer Madurai

5. The District Forest Officer Ramnad-cum-P.M.T.Forest Division Sivagangai 630 501

W.A.Nos.1705 & 1706 of 2017

T.RAJA, J.

AND G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

ss

W.A.Nos.1705 & 1706 of 2017

07.04.2021

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter