Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9192 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2021
C.S.(Com.Div.) No.122 of 2021
and A.No.1333 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 07.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
C.S.(Com.Div.) No.122 of 2021
and A.No.1333 of 2021
Mrs.A.R.Yasmeen,
Sole Proprietriz,
M/s.Multiport,
No.5/2, Periamet,
Kattur Sadaiappan Street,
Chennai-600 003. .. Plaintiff
/versus/
Owners and parties interested
in the Vessel M.T.ARK PIONEER,
now lying at the Port of Chennai
and is Represented by its Master. .. Defendant
This Civil Suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 Original Side
Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC Read With Section 5, and
Sections 16 R/W Rule 2 and 3 of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction and
Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017, prayed for (a) For a sum of
Rs.13,42,748.63 (Rupees Thirteen Lakhs Forty Two Thousand Seven
1/5
C.S.(Com.Div.) No.122 of 2021
and A.No.1333 of 2021
Hundred and Forty Eight and paise Sixty Three only) with further interest
at 24% per annum on Rs.9,45,733.35 from the date of plaint till the date
of realization in full;
(b) For Arrest and sale of the defendant Vessel being M.T.ARK
PIONEER, in as is where is condition, together with her engines, gears,
tackles, apparels, plant, machinery, furniture and fittings and
paraphernalia presently in Indian Waters at Chennai Port, Tamil Nadu,
India;
(c) For a direction to adjust the sale proceeds of the defendant
Vessel being M.T.ARK PIONEER against the suit claim;
(d) For costs of this Suit;
For plaintiff : Mr.S.Vasudevan
JUDGMENT
The suit is filed for arrest of the Vessel in view of money
payable to the plaintiff.
C.S.(Com.Div.) No.122 of 2021 and A.No.1333 of 2021
2. This Court, at the time of admission being satisfied with the
plea of the plaintiff, had ordered the arrest of the Vessel M.T.ARK
PIONEER berthed at the port of Chennai till 07.04.2021.
3. The plaintiff had filed a memo dated 29.03.2021 reporting
that before the Vessel could be arrested, the defendant has come forward
to settle the money due and had settled the same to the satisfaction of the
plaintiff and therefore, the arrest warrant was not executed and also the
Vessel has left from Chennai Port. In the memo, the plaintiff has sought
for recording the satisfaction of the suit claim and order refund of full
Court fee.
4. From the memo, this Court understands that the plaintiff,
who sought for arrest of vessel, had himself given up not to arrest the
Vessel and not executed the warrant. The matter has been settled and this
Court also understands from the memo that the Vessel has already left
from the jurisdiction. Therefore, nothing survives in the suit. Hence the
suit is dismissed as withdrawn. Regarding the refund of Court fee, the
C.S.(Com.Div.) No.122 of 2021 and A.No.1333 of 2021
Registry shall follow the rule and pass appropriate orders. Consequently,
all other connected applications are closed. There shall be no order as to
costs.
07.04.2021
Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order Index : yes/no rpl
C.S.(Com.Div.) No.122 of 2021 and A.No.1333 of 2021
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
rpl
C.S.(Com.Div.) No.122 of 2021 and A.No.1333 of 2021
07.04.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!