Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11248 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2021
T.C.A.No.478 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.04.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
T.C.A.No.478 of 2013
Commissioner of Income-tax,
Chennai. ... Appellant
Vs.
Shri M G Muthu
No.1, 9th Street,
Dr. Radhakrishna Salai,
Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004. ... Respondent
Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras,
“A” Bench, dated 24.08.2012 in I.TA.No.1281/Mds/2011, Assessment
Year 2002-03.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Rajesh
Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.B.Sivaraman
Page 1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
T.C.A.No.478 of 2013
JUDGMENT
(Judgment was delivered by M.DURAISWAMY, J.) We have heard Mr.S.Rajesh, learned Standing Counsel for the
appellant/Revenue and Mr.B.Sivaraman, learned counsel for the
respondent/assessee.
2.The appeal, filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the
Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act) is directed against the order
dated 24.08.2012 made in I.TA.No.1281/Mds/2011 on the file of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “A” Bench (for brevity, the
Tribunal) for the Assessment Year 2002-03.
3.The appeal was admitted on 28.10.2013 on the following
substantial question of law:
“Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the payment made by M/s.MGM Diamond Beach Resorts P Ltd., to M/s.Anand Transport is not taxable as deemed dividend taxable in the hand of the assessee?”
Page 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.478 of 2013
4.The learned Standing Counsel for the appellant submits that the
above appeal is not pursued by the Revenue on account of the Low Tax
Effect in terms of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the
Central Board of Direct Taxes. By the said Circular, the monetary limit
for filing or pursuing an appeal before the High Court has been increased
to Rs.1 crore. It is further submitted that the tax effect in this case is less
than the threshold limit.
5.In the light of the said submissions, the above Tax Case Appeal
is dismissed as withdrawn on account of the Low Tax Effect. The
substantial question of law framed is left open. In the event the tax effect
in this case is above the threshold limit fixed in the said Circular,
liberty is granted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court to
restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. No costs.
[M.D., J.] [R.H., J.]
30.04.2021
mkn
Page 3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.478 of 2013
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes
To
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, “A” Bench
2.The Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai.
Page 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.C.A.No.478 of 2013
M.DURAISWAMY, J.
and R. HEMALATHA, J.
mkn
T.C.A.No.478 of 2013
30.04.2021
Page 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!