Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Kalai Selvan vs The Director
2021 Latest Caselaw 11160 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11160 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2021

Madras High Court
K.Kalai Selvan vs The Director on 30 April, 2021
                                                                    W.P(MD)No.8290 of 2021

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED: 30.04.2021

                                                  CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

                                           W.P(MD)No.8290 of 2021
                                                    and
                                          W.M.P(MD)No.6273 of 2021

                 K.Kalai Selvan                                       ... Petitioner


                                                    vs.
                 1.The Director,
                   O/o.The Directorate of Public Health and
                     Preventive Medicine,
                   No.359, Anna Salai,
                   Chennai – 6.

                 2.The Deputy Director of Health Services,
                   Thanjavur,
                   Thanjavur District.                                ... Respondents


                 PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                 for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records
                 relating to the impugned order in O.Mu.No.26510/Pa.Tho.3/Iru 2/2021,
                 dated 22.03.2021 passed by the first respondent and to quash the same
                 as arbitrary and consequently to direct the first respondent to appoint
                 the petitioner on compassionate ground in any suitable post in the
                 respondents Department within the time limit stipulated by this Court.




                 1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                             W.P(MD)No.8290 of 2021

                                    For Petitioner    : Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthik

                                    For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramesh
                                                      Special Government Pleader

                                                         ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus,

to quash the impugned order in O.Mu.No.26510/Pa.Tho.3/Iru 2/2021,

dated 22.03.2021, passed by the first respondent and consequently to

direct the first respondent to appoint the petitioner on compassionate

ground in the respondents Department within the time limit to be fixed

by this Court.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the

learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3.According to the petitioner, while his father, namely Kaliya

Perumal, was serving as a Field Worker in the respondents Department,

died on 26.03.2012. Further, according to the petitioner, he is a M.A

(Tamil) Graduate. Hence, the petitioner sent a representation to the

second respondent on 23.03.2015, seeking appointment on

compassionate ground enclosing all the documents required by the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.8290 of 2021

respondents. On receipt of the said application, the second respondent

directed the petitioner to obtain Legal Heirship Certificate of his father,

since his father had two wives. The petitioner along with others filed a

suit in O.S.No.78 of 2016 on the file of the District Munsif and Judicial

Magistrate, Pabanasam. Pending the suit, the parties entered into the

compromise. The trial Court, based on the compromise memo, by

Judgment and Decree, dated 28.08.2017, decreed the suit in favour of

the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner again sent a representation to

the respondents enclosing all the required documents. The second

respondent forwarded the same to the first respondent. In the

meantime, the first respondent, vide proceedings in O.Mu.No.

26510/Pa.Tho.3/Iru2/2021, dated 22.03.2021, rejected the application

on the ground that the petitioner submitted the application seeking

compassionate appointment after a lapse of three years from the date of

death of his father. Challenging the same, the petitioner has come out

with the present Writ Petition.

4.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the

respondents produced the written instructions of the second respondent,

dated 24.04.2021 and submitted that the application sent by the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.8290 of 2021

petitioner seeking appointment on compassionate ground has been sent

to the another Section (E3 Section) of the Directorate Office and the

application submitted by the petitioner is under consideration.

5.It is seen from the records that the petitioner has sent a

representation on 23.03.2015 for appointment on compassionate ground

within three years from the date of death of his father. Again he has sent

a representation to the second respondent with all the required

documents and the second respondent has forwarded the same to the

first respondent. Based on the representation of the petitioner, the first

respondent, by impugned order, dated 22.03.2021, rejected the request

of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground on the

ground that the petitioner has not made request for appointment on

compassionate ground within three years from the date of death of his

father. The said reason is contrary to the intervening correspondence

between the respondents. The intervening correspondence and the

written instructions given by the second respondent, which was produced

by the learned Special Government Pleader, show non-application of

mind of the first respondent and the first respondent has not properly

appreciated the materials placed before him.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.8290 of 2021

6.For the above reasons, the impugned order, dated 22.03.2021,

passed by the first respondent is set aside. The first respondent has not

passed order based on the communication sent by the second

respondent along with the records of the deceased employee and

representation of the petitioner. In view of the written instructions given

by the second respondent, the first respondent is directed to consider

the petitioner's application for appointment on compassionate ground

suitable to his educational qualification and pass appropriate orders on

merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from

the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7.With the above directions, the Writ Petition is allowed. No costs.

consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

30.04.2021 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ps

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P(MD)No.8290 of 2021

V.M.VELUMANI,J.

ps

Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To

1.The Director, O/o.The Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, No.359, Anna Salai, Chennai – 6.

2.The Deputy Director of Health Services, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.

W.P(MD)No.8290 of 2021

30.04.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter