Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. T.D.Naidu vs The Collector
2021 Latest Caselaw 11049 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11049 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2021

Madras High Court
Dr. T.D.Naidu vs The Collector on 29 April, 2021
                                                                              W.P. No.10219 of 2021

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 29.04.2021

                                                      CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN

                                                W.P. No.10219 of 2021

                     Dr. T.D.Naidu,
                     S/o. K.P.Naidu                               …      Petitioner


                                                         Vs

                     1. The Collector,
                        Thiruvallur District,
                        Thiruvallur- 602 001.

                     2. The Project Director,
                        National Highways Authority of India,
                        Project Implementation unit,
                        "Sri Tower" 3rd floor,
                        DP-34 (SP), Industrial Estate, Guindy,
                        Chennai 600 032.

                     3. The Special District Revenue Officer
                           (Land Acquisition), NH-205,
                        No. 3 & 4, Lal Bagadhur Sasthri Street,
                        Periyakuppam Railway Station,
                        (Near) Thulasi Theatre,
                        Thiruvallur - 602 001                           ...      Respondents




                     1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                     W.P. No.10219 of 2021

                                   Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
                     issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the              respondents to disburse the
                     statutory entitlements namely 30% solatium on the market value of the land
                     and 12% on the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Act from
                     the date of notification issued under the Act to the date of making of
                     theaward and on the enhanced market value under Section 28 of the Act @
                     9% per annum from the date of issuance of notification for the first year
                     ending and thereafter, @ 15% per annum till the date of tender of
                     compensation amount of Rs.72.60/- per square feet and interest on the
                     solatium and the additional amount, being the market value as of now
                     accepted by the respondents, in pursuance of award R.C.No.21899-1/2011
                     F2 dated 16.02.2021 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal cum District Collector,
                     Thiruvallur district in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme
                     Court of India in the matter of Union of India and another vs/ Tarsem Singh
                     and others in C.A.No.7064 of 2019 for the petitioner's property measuring
                     an extent of 17,259 sq. mts which is 185774.33 sq.feet situated at
                     Ramancheri Revenue Village, Thiruvallur Taluk and District.

                               For petitioner                    ...    Mr. A. Saravanan


                               For respondents                   ...    Mr. D.Raja,
                                                                        Addl. Gov. Pleader
                                                                        for R1 & R3

                                                                 ...    Mrs. S.R.Sumathi,
                                                                        Standing Counsel, for R2

                     2/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                  W.P. No.10219 of 2021

                                                      ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the

respondents to consider the petitioner's representation to disburse the

statutory solatium and interest to the petitioner.

2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner's land was

acquired for National Highways, and an award was also passed. While

passing the award, solatium and interest on solatium was not granted to the

petitioner. Hence, he has filed an arbitration proceeding before the first

respondent/District Collector and the first respondent/District Collector also

did not consider the issue of payment of solatium and interest on it. Hence,

the present writ petition has been filed.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

land was acquired under the National Highways Authorities Act. Earlier,

payment of solatium and the interest on the solatium has not been granted.

Hence, he made a representation before the first respondent/District

Collector. Since, the same has not been considered the present writ petition

has been filed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No.10219 of 2021

4. Mr. D.Raja, learned Additional Government Pleader

appearing for the respondents 1 and 3 and Mr.S.R.Symathy, learned

Standing counsel appearing for the second respondent would submit that

the entitlement of solatium has to be considered by the third respondent

Acquisition Officer and the petitioner cannot make a representation before

the District Collector. The District Collector is only an Arbitrator under

Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act. Hence, the petitioner may be

directed to file a fresh representation to the third respondent.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances, the

petitioner is directed to file a suitable representation before the 3rd

respondent/ Acquisition Officer seeking for solatium and interest on it, with

in a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On

filing such representation, the third respondent Acquisition Officer is

directed to consider the same and pass suitable orders on merits and in

accordance with law within a period of eight weeks thereafter.

6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No.10219 of 2021

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed,

29.04.2021 Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order mrp

To

1. The Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur- 602 001.

2. The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, Project Implementation unit, "Sri Tower" 3rd floor, DP-34 (SP), Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

3. The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition), NH-205, No. 3 & 4, Lal Bagadhur Sasthri Street, Periyakuppam Railway Station, (Near) Thulasi Theatre, Thiruvallur - 602 001

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ W.P. No.10219 of 2021

V. BHARATHIDASAN, J.

mrp

W.P. No.10219 of 2021

29.04.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter