Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10904 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2021
S.A.No. 333 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
S.A. No.333 of 2017
N.Kanniappan .. Appellant
Vs
P.Karthik .. Respondent
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908,
against the judgment and decree dated 18.07.2016 passed by the learned
Principal Sub Judge, Chengalpattu in A.S. No.35 of 2015 and the judgment and
decree dated 16.02.2015 passed by the learned District Munsif, Chengalpattu,
in O.S. No.316 of 2006.
For Appellants : No appearance
For Respondent : Mr. R.Kanakaraj
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/3
S.A.No. 333 of 2017
JUDGMENT
When the matter was listed on 27.04.2021, there was no representation
on behalf of the appellant. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to list the
matter on 28.04.2021 under the caption “For dismissal”. Though the matter is
listed today under the caption “For dismissal” and the names of the parties are
being printed, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, this
Court has no other option but to dismiss the second appeal for non-prosecution
and the same is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
28.04.2021
Index:Yes/No Speaking order / Non speaking order
bkn
To
The Principal Sub Judge, Chengalpattu.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No. 333 of 2017
S.S.SUNDAR. J.,
bkn
S.A. No. 333 of 2017
28.04.2021
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!