Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10517 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2021
T.O.S.No.1 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
T.O.S.No.1 of 2012
M.Rajab Mohideen ...Plaintiff
.Vs.
1.K.Kamala Perumal
2.A.Krishnammal @ A.Krishnaveni
3.L.Thangarajkumar
4.L.Dilipkumar
5.L.Ashok Kumar
6.Vimala
7.A.Chandrasekaran
8.K.Vijayanthi
9.A.Kalavathy ... Defendants
Plaint filed under Order XXV Rule 4 of Original Side Rules read
with Sections 222 and 276 of Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925
praying that he may be permitted to prove the WILL in common form
and that Probate thereof, to have the effect throughout the State of Tamil
Nadu may be granted to him.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
T.O.S.No.1 of 2012
For Plaintiff : Mr.A.Siddique Ali
For Defendants : Mr.Asif Ali for D3
Mr.V.Ramesh Kumar for D7 to D9
********
JUDGMENT
It is seen from the records that O.P.No.436 of 2004 was allowed
on 06.12.2004 granting Probate in favour of the plaintiff Mr.Rajab
Mohideen for the last Will and Testament of Tmt.P.Yashodha dated
05.03.2002.
2. The original respondent had appeared before this Court and had
expressed his no objection for Probate in favour of the petitioner, based
on which the order dated 06.12.2004 came to be passed. However,
subsequently one A.Krishnammal @ A.Krishnaveni, the 2nd respondent
in the Original Petition filed an application in A.No.1945 of 2006
seeking revocation of the Probate. Though, the same was dismissed by
this Court on appeal in O.S.A.No.32 of 2010, A Division Bench of this
Court revoked the Probate on 05.04.2011. Therefore, the Original
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.O.S.No.1 of 2012
Petition was converted into Testamentary Original Suit and numbered as
T.O.S.No.1 of 2012. In the mean time, the applicant in the application
for revocation A.Krishnammal @ A.Krishnaveni, died on 08.07.2007
and the defendants 7, 8 and 9 were impleaded as her legal
representatives. Thus, the defendants 7, 8 and 9 have filed affidavits
submitting to a decree and expressing no objection for granting Probate
in favour of the plaintiff.
3. Heard Mr.Siddiq Ali, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff.
and Mr.Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the defendants 7,
8 and 9.
4. The affidavits filed by the defendants are accepted and the
Testamentary Original Suit is decreed as prayed for without costs.
23.04.2021 dsa
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ T.O.S.No.1 of 2012
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
dsa
List of the witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff: Nil List of the witnesses examined on the side of the defendants: Nil List of Exhibits marked on the side of the defendants: Nil
23.04.2021 dsa Index : No Internet : Yes Non-speaking order
T.O.S.No.1 of 2012
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!