Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Managing Director vs Minor Saranya
2021 Latest Caselaw 10167 Mad

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10167 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 April, 2021

Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Minor Saranya on 21 April, 2021
                                                                    C.M.A.Nos.3784 to 3786 of 2008

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 21.04.2021

                                                       CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                           C.M.A.Nos.3784 to 3786 of 2008 and
                                                   MP.No.1 of 2008

                     CMA.No.3784 of 2008

                     The Managing Director,
                     The Tamilnadu State Express Transport
                     Corporation Ltd., Chennai-2                                ... Appellant

                                                         Versus

                     1.Minor Saranya
                     2.Minor Rukkumani
                       Minors are rep by their
                       Grandmother                                              ... Respondents

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the award made in MCOP.No.416 of 2005 dated 30.11.2006 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal and Sub Court at Gingee.

CMA.No.3785 of 2008

The Managing Director,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.3784 to 3786 of 2008

The Tamilnadu State Express Transport Corporation Ltd., Chennai-2 ... Appellant

Versus

1.R.Thulasi

2.Renuka

3.Hariraman

4.Miniyammal

5.Minor Saranya

6.Minor Rukkumani Minors are rep by their Grandmother ... Respondents

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the award made in MCOP.No.417 of 2005 dated 30.11.2006 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal and Sub Court at Gingee.

CMA.No.3786 of 2008

The Managing Director, The Tamilnadu State Express Transport Corporation Ltd., Chennai-2 ... Appellant

Versus

1.R.Thulasi

2.Renuka

3.Minor Saranya

4.Minor Rukkumani Minors are rep by their

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.3784 to 3786 of 2008

Grandmother ... Respondents

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the award made in MCOP.No.141 of 2005 dated 30.11.2006 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal and Sub Court at Gingee.

                                            For Appellant
                                             in all CMA's     : Mr.V.S.Vasantha Kumar

                                            For Respondents
                                             in all CMA's   : No Appearance

                                                 COMMON JUDGMENT

These appeals have been laid as against the award made in

MCOP.Nos.416, 417 & 141 of 2005 dated 30.11.2006 on the file of the

Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal and Sub Court at Gingee.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to

hereunder according to their litigative status before the Tribunal.

3. The case of the claimants is that on 06.06.2004 at about 8.30

p.m., when the claimants and the deceased were travelling in a motor cycle,

the bus owned by the respondent driven by its driver driving in a rash and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.3784 to 3786 of 2008

negligent manner hit the motor cycle. Therefore, the deceased persons

sustained grievous injuries and died. The legal heirs of the deceased

Saravanan, the legal heirs of the deceased Chinnaponnu @ Anjalakshi and

the legal heirs of the deceased minor Radha filed separate claim petitions.

4. Resisting the same, the respondent filed counter stating that

only because of rash and negligent driving of the deceased, the accident

took place and as such the respondent is not liable to pay any compensation

as claimed by the claimants and sought for dismissal of the claim petitions.

5. On the side of the claimants, they examined P.W.1 to P.W.3 and

marked Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.4. On the side of the respondent, examined R.W.1

and no documentary evidence was let in. On the basis of the evidence

available on records and also considering the submission made by the

learned counsel appearing on either side, the Tribunal awarded

Rs.2,70,000/- in MCOP.No.416 of 2005, Rs.8,56,000/- in MCOP.No.417 of

2005 and Rs.9,71,000/- in MCOP.No.141 of 2006. Aggrieved by the

quantum of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal, the respondent came

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.3784 to 3786 of 2008

forward with the present appeals.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that

the Tribunal failed to consider that the accident was not happened due to the

rash and negligent driving of the respondent. Only on the rash and negligent

driving of the deceased driver of the two wheeler, the accident took place

and as such the respondent is not liable to pay compensation. Further, the

Tribunal erroneously applied multiplier method at 15 and also fixed

monthly salary of Rs.15,000/- of the first deceased and awarded

compensation.

7. Heard Mr.V.S.Vasantha Kumar, learned counsel appearing for

the appellant. Though notice was served, no one appeared on behalf of the

respondents before this Court in person or through pleader.

8. The husband, wife and daughter were traveling in a two

wheeler on 06.06.2004 and the respondent bus was driven by its driver in a

rash and negligent manner and hit the two wheeler, due to which all the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.3784 to 3786 of 2008

persons who travelled in the motorcyle sustained grievous injuries and died.

There are three claim petitions filed for each of the deceased by their

respective legal heirs. The first deceased was doing mason job and aged

only about 23 years at the time of accident. The second deceased aged about

21 years and she was a tailor. Insofar as the third deceased, she was minor

and aged about only 3 years. Considering their age and income, the Tribunal

rightly awarded compensation for Rs.2,70,000/-, Rs.8,56,000/- and

Rs.9,71,000/- respectively. Therefore, this Court finds no infirmity or

illegality in the orders passed by the court below.

9. Accordingly, all the civil miscellaneous appeals are dismissed.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No Costs.

(i) In respect of CMA.No.3784 of 2008, the appellant /

insurance company is directed to deposit the total compensation of

Rs.2,70,000/- with accrued interest and costs as determined at by the

Tribunal, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this judgment, after adjusting the amount, if any, already deposited. The

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.3784 to 3786 of 2008

claimants / respondents herein being minors, their shares are directed to be

deposited in any one of the nationalized bank till they attain majority. The

grand mother of the minor respondents herein is permitted to withdraw the

accrued interest once in three months.

(ii) In respect of CMA.No.3785 of 2008, the appellant /

insurance company is directed to deposit the total compensation of

Rs.8,56,000/- with accrued interest and costs as determined at by the

Tribunal, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this judgment, after adjusting the amount, if any, already deposited. On

such deposit, the claimants / respondents 1 to 4 herein are permitted to

withdraw the amount awarded as apportioned by the Tribunal by filing

proper application before the Tribunal. The share of the claimants / minor

respondents 5 & 6 herein are directed to be deposited in any one of the

nationalized bank till they attain majority. The grand mother of the minor

respondents herein is permitted to withdraw the accrued interest once in

three months.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.3784 to 3786 of 2008

(iii) In respect of CMA.No.3786 of 2008, the appellant /

insurance company is directed to deposit the total compensation of

Rs.9,71,000/- with accrued interest and costs as determined at by the

Tribunal, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this judgment, after adjusting the amount, if any, already deposited. On

such deposit, the claimants / respondents 1 and 2 herein are permitted to

withdraw the amount awarded as apportioned by the Tribunal by filing

proper application before the Tribunal. The share of the claimants / minor

respondents 3 & 4 herein is directed to be deposited in any one of the

nationalized bank till they attain majority. The grand mother of the minor

respondents 5 & 6 herein is permitted to withdraw the accrued interest once

in three months.

21.04.2021 Index:Yes/No Internet: Yes/no Speaking/Non-speaking Order lok

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.3784 to 3786 of 2008

To

1.The Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal and Sub Court at Gingee.

2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ C.M.A.Nos.3784 to 3786 of 2008

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

lok

C.M.A.Nos.3784 to 3786 of 2008

21.04.2021

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter