Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Akash Rawat vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 2252 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2252 MP
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Akash Rawat vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 9 March, 2026

Author: Milind Ramesh Phadke
Bench: Milind Ramesh Phadke
         NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:8087




                                                             1                            MCRC-10198-2026
                             IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                   AT GWALIOR
                                                       BEFORE
                                     HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
                                                  ON THE 9 th OF MARCH, 2026
                                           MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 10198 of 2026
                                                  RAMLAKHAN RAWAT
                                                         Versus
                                             THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                          Appearance:
                                  Shri Madan Mohan Tripathi - Advocate for the applicant.
                                  Shri Manish Saxena - Public Prosecutor for the State.
                                                                 WITH
                                           MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 10194 of 2026
                                                     AKASH RAWAT
                                                         Versus
                                             THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                          Appearance:
                                  Shri Madan Mohan Tripathi - Advocate for the applicant.
                                  Shri Manish Saxena - Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                                                 ORDER

These are the first bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS filed by the applicants No.1 and 2, namely, Ramlakhan Rawat and Akash Rawat for grant of their bail. The applicants have been arrested on 06.02.2026 in connection with crime No.02/2025 registered at Police Station RPF, District Gwalior for offence punishable under Section 3 of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:8087

2 MCRC-10198-2026 As per prosecution case, it was alleged that on 06/02/2026, during patrol checking in the Gwalior Railway Station yard, three persons were seen entering the amended building of the railway yard. On suspicion, the patrolling staff approached the building and observed that the three persons were carrying some heavy articles in two white plastic sacks. When they were called out and questioned regarding the said sacks, the persons attempted to flee. However, they were apprehended. Upon interrogation regarding the articles in their possession, they admitted that the said property had been stolen from the railway station. Thereafter, 30 pieces of pendrol clips and 2 pieces of fish plates were seized from the accused persons. The accused were arrested, and subsequently Crime No. 02/2026 under Section 3

of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act was registered against them by the Railway Protection Force Post, Gwalior.

Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent persons and have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is contended that the alleged recovery shown by the prosecution has been falsely planted upon the applicants and no such railway property was actually recovered from their conscious possession. It is further submitted that the applicants have not committed any offence as alleged and have no connection with the alleged theft of railway property. It is further submitted that they are in custody since 06.02.2026 and the trial is likely to take considerable time to conclude. The applicant is a permanent resident of District Morena and there is no likelihood of his absconding or tempering with the prosecution evidence. On these grounds, prayer has been made to

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:8087

3 MCRC-10198-2026 extend the benefit of bail to the applicants.

Per contra, the learned counsel for the State has opposed the applications and prayed for their rejection, contending that considering the nature and gravity of the offence, coupled with the fact that the applicants have two criminal antecedents.

Heard the counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. Considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, coupled with the fact that the trial is not likely to conclude in near future and prolonged pre-trial detention being an anathema to the concept of liberty, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the applicants. Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, this bail application is allowed. It is directed that the applicants be released on bail upon each of them furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court for thier appearance before it on the dates given by the concerned Court, subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicants:-

1. The applicants will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by them;

2. The applicants will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3. The applicants will not indulge themselves in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:8087

4 MCRC-10198-2026 Officer, as the case may be;

4. The applicants shall not commit any other offence during pendency of the trial, failing which this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically, without further reference to the Bench;

5. The applicants will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6. The applicants will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

Copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance. Certified copy as per rules.

(MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE

pwn*

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter