Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Ankit Goswami vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2026 Latest Caselaw 859 MP

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 859 MP
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Dr. Ankit Goswami vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 January, 2026

Author: Vijay Kumar Shukla
Bench: Vijay Kumar Shukla
                                                              1                                 WP-3499-2026
                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                      AT INDORE
                                                       WP No. 3499 of 2026
                                     (DR. ANKIT GOSWAMI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS )



                           Dated : 29-01-2026
                                 Shri Abhinav Malhotra - Advocate for the petitioner.

                                 Shri Sudeep Bhargava - Dy. Advocate General for the respondent

No.1 to 4 & 6 on advance notice.

Issue notice.

Since the respondent No.1 to 4 & 6 is represented therefore, no P.F is

required to be paid, whereas with regard to respondent No.5 & 7 learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already supplied the copy of the petition to Shri Romesh Dave. Let the name of Shri Romesh Dave be reflected for respondent No. 5 & 7 in the cause list.

In this instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has called in question the legality and validity of the notification dated 03.09.2025 (Annexure P/10) passed in exercise of the powers under Section 12 of the M.P Niji Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha (Pravesh Ka Viniyam Evam Shulk Ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007 whereby

the Schedule-I of the Madhya Pradesh Chikitsa Shiksha Pravesh Niyam, 2018 has been amended.

It is argued that by the learned counsel for the petitioner that said amendment in Condition No.5 at Serial No.3 of Schedule-I of the Rules, 2018, an additional eligibility condition has been imposed to the effect that only those candidates who have completed their MBBS degree from medical

2 WP-3499-2026 colleges situated within the State of Madhya Pradesh shall be First eligible to participate in counseling and take admission to NEET-PG courses, including under the NRI quota. He further argued that such condition was not existing prior to the said notification. The petitioner had participated in the NEET examination 2025 and he is seeking admission to the PG course pursuant to the said examination. He referred the last column of the Schedule-I of the Niyam, 2018 to submit that in case if the candidates who have passed MBBS examination from a medical college situated in Madhya Pradesh are not available in the first round of counseling, the said condition shall automatically stand relaxed. He stated that the candidates who have passed MBBS examination from medical college of Madhya Pradesh are not available for the second or third round of counseling, therefore the name of

the petitioner ought to have been included in the list of candidates who are to be called for the PG courses, for the same the registration will commence from 30.01.2026 and counseling is scheduled from 02.02.2026 to 04.02.2026.

Shri Sudeep Bhargava, learned Dy. Advocate General for the respondent/State submitted that the said relaxation mentioned in the last column of Schedule-I of the Niyam, 2018 was applicable immediately after the end of the first round of counseling in case the candidates are not available. Since, the second round of counseling has already come to an end therefore, the petitioner does not get any benefit of the relaxation.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, prima-facie we are of the view that relaxation mentioned in the last column relates to Condition No.5

3 WP-3499-2026 of the Niyam, 2018 which provides eligibility for admission. In the event of non-availability of candidates who had passed MBBS examination from a recognised medical college of the State of Madhya Pradesh same would be applicable after the end of the first round of counseling i.e second round of counseling or subsequent thereto.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner that he fulfills all the eligibility from Serial No.1 to 4, we direct that the name of the petitioner would be registered for the purpose of counseling for PG courses and the petitioner will be permitted to participate in the counseling subject to fulfillment of other conditions. However, the result of the petitioner shall not be declared without leave of this Court.

It is informed that the result of the counseling will be declared on 06.02.2026, considering the same, the matter be listed on 04.02.2026 .

C.C today.

                              (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)                                (ALOK AWASTHI)
                                      JUDGE                                           JUDGE
                           akanksha

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter