Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2016 MP
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2026
1 WP-46640-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
WP No. 28595 of 2025
(MONIKA SOLANKI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS )
WP/12234/2019, WP/29530/2025, WP/46640/2025, WP/3905/2026
Dated : 25-02-2026
Shri Govind Pal Singh Songara, Advocate for the petitioner in W.P.
No.28595/2025.
Shri Ajay Bagadiya, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Kirti Dubey,
Advocate for the petitioner in W.P No.12234/2019.
Shri Manish Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner in W.P.
No.29530/2025.
Advocate Saransh Dubey - petitioner is present in person in W.P.
No.46640/2025.
Shri Abhinav P. Dhanodkar, Advocate for the petitioner in W.P.
No.3905/2026.
Shri Koustubh Pathak and Shri Vivek Patwa, Members of the
Committee.
Shri Vinay Zelawat, Sr. Advocate - Chairman of the Traffic
Committee.
Shri Shrey Raj Saxena, Dy. A. G. for the respondent/State in all the
petitions.
Shri Bhuwan Gautam, Advocate for the respondent No.2 in W.P. No.28595/2025 and respondent No.3 in W.P. No.12234/2019.
Shri Ashutosh Gondli, Advocate for the respondent No.6 in W.P No.12234/2019.
Shri Saransh Jain, Advocate for the intervenor in W.P.
2 WP-46640-2025
No.12234/2019.
In compliance to the order dated 19.01.2026, counsel for the State has submitted that 08 agencies have been appointed for removal of the barricades and dismantle of bus stops by the Corporation. He further submits that out of 17 bus stops, in respect of 03 bus stops, partial dismantle has already been done. He submits that nodal officers, as directed by this Court has already been appointed. He also submits that he has prepared a status report in this regard.
Let a copy of the status report be supplied to the counsel for the petitioner and the same be uploaded in the ERP so that other counsels for the
petitioner may have access to the said report.
Shri Koustubh Pathak, who is member of the Committee appointed by this Court also prays for time to submit the latest report within 10 days.
Considering the same, list the matter on 11.03.2026. On the said date, the Collector, Indore and Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Indore shall remain present before this Court.
Shri Vinay Zelawat, Senior Counsel - Chairman of the Traffic Committee appointed by this Court has submitted that the Traffic Regulatory Committee is preparing its report. It is further submitted that meetings have been held and to some extent the work regarding improvement of the traffic in the town have been done. Nodal Officer Shri Kushwah, present in the Court has been asked to continue to hold periodical meetings with the Committee and to apprise them about their plans for smooth movement of
3 WP-46640-2025
the traffic on the said road and in the town. He will also invite suggestions of the members of the Committee. Before next date, further progress report will be submitted by the Committee.
Petitioner - Advocate Saransh Dubey, who is present in person submits that this PIL is mainly related to the parking problem of Police Station Bhanwarkua, which causes hindrance in smooth movement of the traffic on the road.
Shri Vivek Patwa, Advocate, who is one of the member of the Traffic Regulatory Committee will hold a meeting of DCP (Traffic) and also SHO, Police Station Bhanwarkua to redress the aforesaid grievance of parking problem on the road before next date. The DCP (Traffic) and SHO, Police Station Bhanwarkua will attend the meeting on the date fixed by the Committee. Before the next date, the Committee shall submit its report. The petitioner(s) would be free to submit their grievances and suggestions before the Committee.
Shri A. P. Dhanodkar, Advocate for the petitioner submits that the said petition is a PIL relating to construction of elevated corridor on the BRTS road. It is stated that the construction of the elevated corridor is not an effective solution for resolving the traffic jam.
Issue notice to the respondents.
Shri Shrey Raj Saxena, Dy. A. G accepts notice on behalf of the
respondent Nos.1 to 5/State.
4 WP-46640-2025 Respondent No.6 is the Indore Development Authority. The petitioner is directed to serve copy of the petition alongwith annexures either to Ms. Mini Ravindran, Advocate or Shri Ambar Pare, Advocate, who ordinarily represents the IDA before this Court.
Office is directed to reflect the name of Ms. Mini Ravindran and Shri Ambar Pare, Advocates in the daily cause list on behalf of the IDA.
Counsel for the State shall file its short reply to the said petition before next date.
IA No.848/2026 has been filed on behalf of Shri Brajendra Gupta seeking intervention. Since, this is a PIL, IA is allowed and the intervenor is permitted to assist this Court on the issue involved in the said PIL. IA stands closed.
Shri Manish Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner has brought to our notice the order dated 31.07.2025 with regard to removal of the flash lights, sirens, change in number plates, which are not as per the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Counsel for the State submits that he has already filed the reply and also affidavit in compliance to the order dated 10.10.2025.
The petitioner is granted time to file the rejoinder, if any, before the next date.
List all the matters on 11.03.2026.
5 WP-46640-2025
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) (ALOK AWASTHI) JUDGE JUDGE gp
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!