Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1946 MP
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2026
1 CRA-1432-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
CRA No. 1432 of 2026
(MAKHAN AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH )
Dated : 24-02-2026
Shri Govind Pal Singh Songara - Advocate for the appellants.
Shri Prashant Jain - G.A. for the respondent/State.
Heard on I.A. No. 2555/2026 and I.A. No. 1867/2026, which are applications under section 430 of the B.N.S.S. 2023 seeking suspension of sentence on behalf of appellants - Govind, Makhan and Pankaj respectively.
2. Appellants have been convicted and sentenced vide order dated 31.01.2026 by First Additional Session Judge, Shujalpur (M.P.) in ST No.36/2024 and sections and convictions are reproduced below:-
S. Total Default
Name Sections Imprisonment Fine
No. Fine Sentence
SI of 15 days
Sec. 115(2) (2 Sec. 115(2): 1 Sec. 115(2): Rs.
(for Sec.
Pankaj counts) r/w Sec. year RI on each 500/- each (Rs.
Rs. 115(2)) and
1 @ 3(5); Sec. 118(1) count; Sec. 1,000/-); Sec.
3,000/- 1 month (for
Vijay (2 counts) r/w 118(1): 3 years RI 118(1): Rs. 1,000/-
Sec. 118(1))
Sec. 3(5) on each count each (Rs. 2,000/-)
respectively
SI of 15 days
Sec. 115(2) r/w (for Sec.
Sec. 115(2): 1 Sec. 115(2): Rs.
Sec. 3(5); Sec. Rs. 115(2)) and
2 Makhan year RI; Sec. 500/-; Sec. 118(1):
118(1) r/w Sec. 2,500/- 1 month (for
118(1): 3 years RI Rs. 1,000/-
3(5) Sec. 118(1))
respectively
SI of 15 days
Sec. 115(2) (2 Sec. 115(2): 1 Sec. 115(2): Rs.
(for Sec.
counts) r/w Sec. year RI on each 500/- each (Rs.
Rs. 115(2) and 1
3 Govind 3(5); Sec. 118(1) count; Sec. 1,000/-); Sec.
month (for
(2 counts) r/w 118(1): 3 years RI 118(1): Rs. 1,000/- 3,000/-
Sec. 118(1)) Sec. 3(5) on each count each (Rs. 2,000/-) respectively
3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants are
2 CRA-1432-2026 innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant Govind has undergone a period of 18 months in custody. The appeal is of the year 2026 and the final hearing of the appeal will likely to take long time, hence prayed for suspension of sentence and release of the appellants on bail.
4. Counsel for the respondent/State opposed the prayer.
5. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, contention of learned counsel for the appellant and without commenting on the merits of the case, the applications I.A. No. 2555/2026 and I.A. No. 1867/2026 are allowed and it is directed that the execution of remaining jail sentence passed against the appellants shall remain suspended and they be released on bail upon their furnishing personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each with separate sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for their appearance before the Registry of this Court on 27.07.2026 and on such further dates as may be fixed in this behalf by the Registry during the pendency of this appeal.
6. List the case for final hearing in due course.
(GAJENDRA SINGH) JUDGE
Vatan
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!