[Cites 5, Cited by 0]
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Ramprasad Vaishya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 February, 2026
Author: Vijay Kumar Shukla
Bench: Vijay Kumar Shukla
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:14330
1 MCRC-6131-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
ON THE 19 th OF FEBRUARY, 2026
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 6131 of 2026
RAMPRASAD VAISHYA
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Appearance:
Shri Pradeep Singh Chouhan - Advocate for the applicant.
Shri C.M Tiwari - Public Prosecutor for the State.
ORDER
This is first bail application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of
anticipatory bail in connection with crime No.1122/2025, registered at P.S. -
Waidhan District - Singrauli for offences punishable under Sections 3/7 of
Essential Commodities Act and under Section 316(5) of BNS 2023.
2. As per prosecution case it is alleged that upon verification and matching
of the stored foodgrains with the stock recorded in the POS machine, it was found
that there was a shortage of 15.15 quintals of wheat, 61.66 quintals of rice, and
0.03 quintals of sugar as compared to the actual stock. As a result of the shortage
of stock, the accused, being the seller of fair price shop, misappropriated
foodgrains worth Rs.1,85,997/-. During the investigation, the Deputy
Commissioner, Co-operative Department, District Singrauli, exercising powers
under Section 87 of the Madhya Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, along
with the rules and bye-laws framed thereunder, held that any person exercising
such powers or authorized to exercise such powers shall be deemed to be a public
servant within the meaning of Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code. Accordingly,
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:14330
2 MCRC-6131-2026
since the accused is an employee of a cooperative society, he has been considered
to fall within the ambit of a public servant, and therefore Section 316(5) of the
BNS has been added to the case, which pertains to criminal breach of trust by a
public servant in respect of property entrusted to him. From the perusal of the case
diary, it is evident that Section 316(5) of the BNS was added to the case on 12-12-
2025. Crime No.1122/25 was registered against the accused by Police Outpost
Waidhan under Section 3 read with Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.
3. Counsel for the applicant submits that initially the applicant was granted
anticipatory bail. However, as per the directions passed by the Supreme Court in
the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, after
the investigation and filing of the charge-sheet, the applicant has been arrested.
4. Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail.
5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration
the fact that the applicant was granted anticipatory bail initially by the trial Court
and had co-operated with the investigation, this Court is of the view that the
applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail.
6. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting
anything on the merits of the case, the anticipatory bail application filed by the
applicant is allowed. It is directed that if the applicant is arrested by the police
then he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount
to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/Arresting Authority.
7. Applicants shall abide by the following conditions under Section 482 (2)
of B.N.S.S:-
(a) Applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a Police
Officer as and when required;
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:14330
3 MCRC-6131-2026
(b) They shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or
promise to complainant or witnesses;
(c) They shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court;
(d) They shall not commit similar offence, of which, they are accused or
suspected. (e) They will further abide by the condition enumerated in sub-section
(3) of Section 480 of the B.N.S.S.
8. A typed copy of this order is being forwarded to the Office of the
Advocate General, on their email address, for intimation to the Police Station
concerned.
9. With the aforesaid, the application is allowed and disposed off .
Certified copy as per rules.
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)
JUDGE
PK
