Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Virendra Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2025 Latest Caselaw 3087 MP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3087 MP
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2025

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Virendra Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 January, 2025

Author: Vijay Kumar Shukla
Bench: Vijay Kumar Shukla
           NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:1500




                                                             1                              WP-997-2025
                             IN     THE      HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                    AT INDORE
                                                       BEFORE
                                      HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
                                                ON THE 21st OF JANUARY, 2025
                                                WRIT PETITION No. 997 of 2025
                                                  VIRENDRA SINGH
                                                       Versus
                                     THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
                          Appearance:
                                  Shri Yashwant Pagare - advocate for the petitioner.

                                  Shri Shashank Sharma - PL for the respondents/State.

                                                                 ORDER

By way of this Wirt Petition, the petitioner who holds the post of Assistant Grate-III and is working under the control and supervision of respondent department is not challenging any specific order, but seeks direction of this Hon'ble Court on the matter of grant of increment from the date of passing Hindi typing examination.

02. The petitioner fairly submits before Hon'ble Court that the respondent department has granted the benefit of increment after one year

from that the date of passing Hindi typing examination while the petitioner is entitled to get the benefit of increment from the date of passing Hindi typing examination as per judgment rendered by Full Bench of this Hon'ble High Court reported in 2016 (1) MPLJ 449 (Manoj Kumar Purohit and Others Vs. State of M.P. & Others) . After the judgment rendered by Full Bench of this Hon'ble High Court in case of Manoj Kumar (Supra) various identical Writ

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:1500

2 WP-997-2025 Petitions have been decided in same terms with direction to concerned respondent department to extend the benefit of increment from the date of passing Hindi Typing examination alongwith consequential benefits. The Division Bench of this Hon'ble High Court in Wirt Appeal No.37/2018 (Anuroop Singhai and others Vs. State of M.P. and others, decided on 19/02/2018) has held that, in light of the judgment passed in the case of Manoj kumar (Supra) the employees like petitioner is entitled to get the benefit of increment from the date of passing Hindi Typing examination. The state government feeling aggrieved with the order dared 19/02/2018 passed by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble High Court in Wirt Appeal No. 37/2018 assailed the same before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India by filing S.L.P. No. 45732/2018 and Hon'ble Apex Court after considering

totality of fact and circumstances of the case has dismissed the S.L.P. The order passed by the High Court has attained the finality. The petitioner who falls within the same zone of consideration is also entitled to get the benefit of increment from the date of passing Hindi Typing Examination. But despite the order pass in Writ Appeal thereafter, dismissal of SLP the respondent department deliberately has not extended the same benefit to the petitioner.

03. It is further submitted that the petitioner has already submitted representations Annexure P/5 & P/6 but till this date they have not been decided.

04. Considering the aforesaid submissions, this petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed and comprehensive

NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-IND:1500

3 WP-997-2025 representation along with the copy of the order passed today and also copy of the judgments which are relied by the petitioner before the respondent No.4 within a period of one month from today and if such representation is submitted the same shall be considered and decided within two months thereafter keeping in view the judgments relied by the petitioner. If the competent authority finds that the case of the petitioner is covered by the aforesaid judgments, he shall be granted the benefits in accordance with the law and if the competent authority is of the view that the case of the petitioner is not covered by the aforesaid judgments, he shall assign the reasons for the same which shall be communicated to the petitioner.

05. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed off.

(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE

soumya

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter