Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4474 MP
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:7469
1 WP-2898-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY DWIVEDI
ON THE 17th OF FEBRUARY, 2025
WRIT PETITION No. 2898 of 2025
K K AWASTHI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
Appearance:
Shri K.K. Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Girish Kekre, Government Advocate for the respondents-State.
ORDER
This petition is against the order passed by the Tribal Department dismissing the petitioner from service on the ground that he has been convicted in a criminal case under Section 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to suffer RI for four years with fine of Rs.5000/-.
Two fold submissions have been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, firstly that before passing the impugned order of dismissal from
service, no opportunity of hearing was afforded to the petitioner and secondly, that the order has been passed by the Tribal department whereas the petitioner is the employee of education department and as such the order should have been issued by the parent department i.e. education department.
I have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Indeed, there is no provision under the law that if any employee is dismissed from service pursuant to his/her conviction for the offence
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:7469
2 WP-2898-2025 involving moral turpitude, notice is required to be given to the employee prior to issuing the order of dismissal from service. As regards second submission - it is clear from the appointment order (Annexure-P/1) that the petitioner was appointed by the Additional Commissioner, Tribal Department and as such this submission has no substance because the appointing authority can issue the order of dismissal as well.
In my opinion, nothing wrong has been committed by the authorities in issuing the order of dismissal on the face of petitioner's conviction.
Petition being misconceived, is hereby dismissed. Needless to observe that in case, the judgment of the trial Court is set aside by any higher court, in that event, the petitioner can claim
reinstatement in service.
(SANJAY DWIVEDI) JUDGE
Sudesh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!