Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rahul Kushwah vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2024 Latest Caselaw 16210 MP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16210 MP
Judgement Date : 30 May, 2024

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Rahul Kushwah vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 30 May, 2024

Author: Vivek Rusia

Bench: Vivek Rusia

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR CRA No. 4602 of 2020 (RAHUL KUSHWAH AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

Dated : 30-05-2024 Shri Sushil Goswami, learned counsel for the appellants.

Shri Lokendra Shrivastava, learned Public Prosecutor for the State.

Per Justice Sanjeev. S. Kalgaonkar Heard on I.A. No. 20620 of 2023, which is second application filed on behalf of appellant No.1 - Rahul Kushwah filed under Section 389 of

Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence. First application for suspension of sentence of appellant - Rahul was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 16.06.2023.

The present appellant stands convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/-, under Section 25(1-b)(a) of Arms Act and sentenced to undergo two years RI with fine of Rs.1,000/- and under Section 27 of Arms Act and sentenced to undergo three years RI with fine of Rs.1,000/- with default stipulations vide impugned judgment dated 28.02.2020 passed by Additional

Sessions Judge Datia, District Datia in S.T. No.21/2017.

As per the case of prosecution, on 01.11.2016, co-appellant Rashmi and her husband - Akhilesh were travelling on a motorcycle. Laxmi Prasad (PW-4) and Lalta Prasad (PW-3) were following them on another motorcycle. Rashmi and Akhilesh stopped midway to answer nature's call. Two unknown assailants came on a motorcycle and fired gunshot at Akhilesh. Akhilesh was also assaulted with baka. Akhilesh died on spot. Police was informed. Head- Constable Harpal Singh of PS- Sarsai reached on spot of the incident. He

found Rashmi crying near the dead body of Akhilesh. Rashmi informed that two unknown assailants have killed her husband. PS- Sarsai registered FIR at Crime No.76/2016 for offence punishable under Section 302 r/w Section 34 of IPC. Next day i.e. 02.11.2016, Lalta Prasad and Laxmi Prasad approached Kuldeep Singh - SHO of PS- Sirsai and alleged that they have seen Rahul (appellant) and his associate Dinesh assaulting Akhilesh. Rahul had fired on Akhilesh with countrymade gun (adhiya) and thereafter, assaulted Akhilesh with baka. Further investigation revealed that Rashmi had an affair with accused Rahul. Therefore, Rashmi and Rahul conspired to kill Akhilesh. The call detail report of communication between mobile-phone of Rashmi and Rahul revealed

communication between them immediately before and after the incident.

Learned counsel for the appellant contends that Lalta Prasad (PW-3) and Laxmi Prasad (PW-4) are chance witnesses. Their testimony is week and unbelievable. They did not report immediately to the police rather they approached the police next day. There is no definite evidence about relationship of Rashmi with the appellant- Rahul. Rashmi has been extended benefit of suspension of sentence and grant of bail vide order dated 03.03.2023, therefore, appellant may also be extended benefit of suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes the application and submits that the judgment of conviction passed by learned Trial Court is well- reasoned judgment. The alleged firearm was seized at the instance of appellant - Rahul. Learned trial Court in Paras 50 to 59 of the judgment has extensively dealt with contentions of defence with regard to testimony of Laxmi Prasad (PW-4) and Lalta Prasad (PW-3) and concluded that their testimony is

trustworthy. Appellant is main accused who had assaulted Akhilesh, therefore,

he may not be extended benefit of suspension of sentence and grant of bail.

Heard both the parties and perused the record.

Upon hearing the learned Counsel for the parties but without commenting upon rival contentions, touching merits of the case, in the considered opinion of this Court, appellant does not deserve suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail. Consequently, IA No.20620 of 2023 stands dismissed.

                               (VIVEK RUSIA)                                 (SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR)
                                  JUDGE                                                JUDGE

                            Vijay








 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter