Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chindhulal Badghaiya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2024 Latest Caselaw 15364 MP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15364 MP
Judgement Date : 22 May, 2024

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Chindhulal Badghaiya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 May, 2024

Author: Chief Justice

Bench: Ravi Malimath, Vishal Mishra

                           1
 IN    THE    HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                   AT JABALPUR
                         BEFORE
           HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,
                      CHIEF JUSTICE
                            &
           HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA
                   ON THE 22 nd OF MAY, 2024
                WRIT PETITION No. 13955 of 2024

BETWEEN:-
1.    CHINDHULAL BADGHAIYA S/O SHRI DEENAJI
      BADGHAIYA,    AGED   ABOUT   65  YEARS,
      OCCUPATION: RETIRED LECTURER FROM GOVT.
      K.N. GIRLS HIGHER SEC. SCHOOL WARASEONI
      BLOCK WARASEONI DISTRICT BALAGHAT WARD
      NO. 24 SURAVI NAGAR BALAGHAT DISTRICT
      BALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH)

2.    DAMAR SINGH KURVETI S/O LATE SHRI
      HANNULAL KURVETI, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
      OCCUPATION: RETIRED PRINCIPAL FROM THE
      OFFICE OF BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER
      LALBARRA    BLOCK    LALBARRA   DISTRICT
      BALAGHAT (M.P.) R/O WARD NO.11 HANUMAN
      MANDIR   ROAD     MARATHE GALI     BUDHI
      BALAGHAT DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH)

3.    KUNDAN SINGH SURYAM S/O LATE SHRI
      DAYARM SURYAM, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
      OCCUPATION: RETIRED ASSISANT PROFESSOR
      FROM THE OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT
      INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING
      MANDLA DISTRICT MANDLA (M.P.) R/O NO.11
      BINEKA KHAIRI MANDLA DISTRICT (MADHYA
      PRADESH)

4.    DEEPAK MATRE S/O LATE SHRI PYARELAL
      MATRE, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
      RETIRED LECTURER FROM GOVT. BOYS HIGHER
      SEC. SCHOOL HATTA SANKUL GOVT. BOYS
      HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL HATTA BLOCK
      BALAGHAT DISTRICT BALAGHAT R/O WARD
      NO.25 HOUSING BOARD COLONY PREMNAGAR
      BALGHAT DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH)
                                 2
                                                          .....PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI B.N. SHARMA - ADVOCATE)

AND
1.    THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS
      PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF
      SCHOOL EDUCATION      VALLABH BHAWAN,
      BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2.    THE COMMISSIONER PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS
      (LOK SHIKSHAN) BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

3.    THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER MANDLA
      DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH)

4.    THE    PRINCIPAL DISTRICT INSTITUTE OF
      EDUCATION AND TRAINING MANDLA DISTRICT
      MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH)

5.    THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER BALAGHAT
      DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH)

6.    THE DISTRICT PENSION OFFICER BALAGHAT
      DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH)

7.    THE JOINT DIRECTOR ACCOUT AND PENSION
      O F F I C E R BALAGHAT DISTRICT (MADHYA
      PRADESH)

8.    THE DISTRICT PENSION OFFICER MANDLA
      DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH)

9.    THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICE MANDLA
      DISTRICT MANDLA (MADHYA PRADESH)

10.   THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER BALAGHAT
      DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                         .....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI S.S. CHOUHAN - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

      This petition coming on for orders this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi
Malimath, Chief Justice passed the following:
                                 ORDER

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the question of law that

arises for consideration in this petition is covered by the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. 8219 of 2020 (Madhya Pradesh Power Transmission Company Limited and another vs. S.R. Ramchandran and others) dated 11.07.2023. Hence, they plead that this petition be also disposed off on the same terms.

In view of the submission made, the petition is disposed off in terms of the aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

However, it is noticed that there are various defaults as pointed out by the Registry including non-payment of deficit court fees. In the larger interest of justice, the defaults except court fee are overruled.

The petitioners to submit the deficit court fees, as demanded by the Registry. Only after the deficit court fees has been paid, the certified copy be issued and the order will be uploaded and not until then.

                                     (RAVI MALIMATH)                                        (VISHAL MISHRA)
                                       CHIEF JUSTICE                                             JUDGE
                               MSP




Date: 2024.05.30 13:47:07 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter