Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 17687 MP
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
CRA No. 711 of 2020
(RAMVEER GURJAR AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
Dated : 25-10-2023
Shri Pawan Vijaywargiya- Advocate for appellants.
Dr. Anjali Gyanani- Public Prosecutor for respondent- State.
Heard on IA.No.15011 of 2023 & I.A. No.15957/2023, first applications u/Sec. 389(1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of appellant No.6-Dev Narayan Gurjar & appellant
No.4-Sukhdev Gurjar respectively.
Vid e judgment dated 21-12-2019 passed by Sessions Judge, District Sheopur in Sessions Trial No.10 of 2019, appellants No.4&6 have been convicted under Section 148 of IPC and sentenced to undergo two years RI with fine of Rs.2,000/-, under Section 302 read with Section 149 of IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/-, under Section 449 of IPC and sentenced to undergo 10 years' R.I. with fine of Rs.10,000/- under Section 323 read with Section 149 of IPC and sentenced to undergo three months' RI with fine of Rs.1,000/- & under Section 324 of IPC and
sentenced to undergo two years RI with fine of Rs.2,000/- with default stipulations. All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.
Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 08-11-2018 at around 02:20 pm, complainant Harishankarlal Meena (PW-1) lodged a dehati nalishi in an injured condition from the Emergency Ward, District Hospital Sheopur to Shri Punnu Singh Paraste, Superintendent of Police (Trainee) Police Reserve Centre Dehat, District Sheopur alleging therein that Ramveer armed with axe, Shambhu Gurjar and Balram armed with Gadasi, present appellant No.6-Devnarayan, Omprakash Signature Not Verified Signed by: PAWAN DHARKAR Signing time: 10/26/2023 4:08:56 PM
and Dhanpal armed with lathi, Rambharat and Latoor armed with farsi, Rajendra and present appellant No.4-Sukhdev armed with gadasi and Radheyshyam armed with ballam entered his house due to old enmity. His wife, daughter and sons Yogesh, Pawan and Jaswant were present in the house. Ramveer and Balram inflicted gadasi blows on his son Yogesh on his left side of his throat by which he fell down on the ground. Shambhu, Devnarayan, Latoor, Omprakash, Rambharat, Radheshyam, Rajendra, Sukhdev and Dhanpal unitedly committed marpeet with his son Pawan by means of gadasi, axe and lathi due to which his son Pawan also sustained injuries on various parts of his body. Dhanpal again inflicted a lathi blow near his left eye as a result of which
blood started oozing out. On hearing his cries, Jaswant, his wife, his daughter and persons were present at his house and Pushpraj, Mahavir and Umesh of village had seen the incident and saved them. Shambhu ran away from the spot thereafter. He along with his son Yogesh and Pawan were brought to the hospital in a jeep for treatment where the doctor declared son Yogesh dead. On the basis of aforesaid dehati nalishi merg no.0 of 2018 was registered. Crime was registered for offence under Sections 452, 323, 147, 148, 307, 302 of IPC. Postmortem of deceased Yogesh was conducted. Matter was investigated. Spot map was prepared as well as blood-stained and plain soil were collected. Statements of witnesses were recorded. Accused were arrested. After completion of investigation and other formalities, charge sheet was filed before the competent Court from where the case was committed to the Sessions Court for its trial. After appreciating the prosecution evidence, the trial Court after conclusion of trial convicted and sentenced the present appellant along with other co-convicted vide impugned judgment.
Signature Not Verified Learned counsel for the present appellants submits that the incident took Signed by: PAWAN DHARKAR Signing time: 10/26/2023 4:08:56 PM
place due to previous enmity between accused party and complainant party. As per allegations, although appellant No.4-Sukhdev was armed with lathi and appellant No.6-Devnarayan was armed with gadasi on the spot but he did not cause any injury to deceased Yogesh. There is no specific overt act attributed to the present appellants. The injury sustained by injured Pawan alleged to be caused by present appellants has not been duly corroborated by medical evidence. The trial Court committed an illegality in convicting and sentencing the present appellants for alleged offences. It is further contended that present appellants has already suffered about four and a half years of jail incarceration. The appeal is of the year 2020 and its final outcome will take some time. Moreso, similarly placed co-accused/appellants No.3&5 namely Sambhu Gurjar & Omprakash Gurjar have already been extended benefit of suspension of sentence by this Court on 6/10/2023 & 31/07/2023 respectively. Hence, learned counsel for appellants prays for suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail to present appellant No.4 & 6 namely Sukhdev Gurjar & Devnarayan Gurjar on the ground of parity.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the respondent/State, while supporting the impugned judgment submits that no exception can be taken in the matter of suspension of sentence and grant of bail to present appellants, regard being had to the nature and the gravity of offence
found proved against the present appellants.
Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, though this Court refrains from commenting upon rival contentions so advanced touching merits of the case, but regard being had to the fact that present appellants have already suffered about four and a half year of jail incarceration coupled with the fact Signature Not Verified Signed by: PAWAN DHARKAR Signing time: 10/26/2023 4:08:56 PM
that similarly placed co-accused/appellants No.3&5 namely Sambhu Gurjar & Omprakash Gurjar have already been extended benefit of suspension of sentence by this Court on 6/10/2023 & 31/07/2023 respectively, appeal is of the year 2020 and there is no likelihood of early hearing of the appeal in near future, in the obtaining facts and circumstances, appellant No.4 & 6 namely Sukhdev Gurjar & Devnarayan Gurjar are held entitled for extension of benefit of suspension of jail sentence.
Accordingly, I.A. No.15011/2023 & I.A. No.15957/2023 stands allowed and it is directed that the jail sentence of appellant No.4 & 6 namely Sukhdev Gurjar & Devnarayan Gurjar shall remain suspended during pendency of present appeal and he be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court subject to verification of factum regarding deposit of fine amount. Appellant No.4 & 6 namely Sukhdev Gurjar & Devnarayan Gurjar are directed to appear before the Registry of this Court first on 07/12/2023 and thereafter, on other subsequent dates as may be fixed by Registry of this Court in this behalf.
Observations on facts, if any, are only for the purpose of deciding the instant I.A. and shall have no bearing on the merits of the appeal.
Certified copy as per rules.
(ROHIT ARYA) (AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH)
JUDGE JUDGE
(Dubey)
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: PAWAN
DHARKAR
Signing time: 10/26/2023
4:08:56 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!