Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 16569 MP
Judgement Date : 7 October, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY DWIVEDI
ON THE 7 th OF OCTOBER, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 23025 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
1. VINDHESHWARI PRASAD TRIPATHI S/O SHRI
GIRJA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILLAGE PURWA
TEHSIL SEMRIYA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2. SITARAM TRIPATHI S/O SHRI GIRJA PRASAD,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, VILALGE PURWA, TEHSIL
SEMRIYA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. ASHISH TRIPATHI S/O LATE DILBHARAN PRASAD
TRIPATHI, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
AGRICULTURIST VILALGE PURWA, TEHSIL
SEMRIYA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. AJAY TRIPATHI S/O LATE DILBHARAN PRASAD
TRIPATHI, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
AGRICULTURIST VILALGE PURWA, TEHSIL
SEMRIYA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. SARASWATI PRASAD TRIPATHI S/O SHRI
SATYANARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILALGE PURWA,
TEHSIL SEMRIYA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
6. LALMANI TRIPATHI S/O SHRI SATYANARAYAN,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
AGRICULTURIST VILALGE PURWA, TEHSIL
SEMRIYA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
7. RAJEEV LOCHAN TRIPATHI S/O SHRI
SATYANARAYAN, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILALGE PURWA,
TEHSIL SEMRIYA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
8. UMAKANT TRIPATHI S/O SHRI SATYANARAYAN,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
2
AGRICULTURIST VILALGE PURWA, TEHSIL
SEMRIYA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
9. SHIVAKANT TRIPATHI S/O SHRI SATYANARAYAN,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
AGRICULTURIST VILALGE PURWA, TEHSIL
SEMRIYA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI SAMDARSHI TIWARI - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
THE COLLECTOR REWA DISTRICT REWA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. COLLECTOR DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3. NAIB TAHSILDAR COLLECTOR CIRCLE SHAHPUR
TAHSIL SEMARIYA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI DARSHAN SONI - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners, by the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is seeking a direction for the respondent/authority to proceed in their matter of mutation which is pending since 2021 before the Tahsildar. He submits that in pursuance to the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Court in favour of the petitioners, though they have moved an application for mutation before the Tahsildar and on their application, a case got registered, but since the Tahsildar in the matter had sought guidance from the Collector which is still awaited, therefore, the Tahsildar is not proceeding in the matter.
2. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of directing the Tahsildar to pass a final order in the matter even though the guidance or opinion sought from the Collector is not received by the Tahsildar. It is for the Tahsildar to take an independent decision in the matter in accordance with law and pass a final order thereon within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioners stands disposed of.
4. However, it is made clear that if opinion of the Collector is necessary in the matter, then the said authority is also directed to take steps in the matter and forward his opinion to the concerning revenue officer as expeditiously as possible.
(SANJAY DWIVEDI) JUDGE Devashish
DEVASHISH MISHRA 2023.10.07 15:35:57 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!