Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7757 MP
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
ON THE 11 th OF MAY, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 11143 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
SMT. MAHRAJI BASOR W/O SHRI RAMBARAN
BHARUA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
STHAYI KARMI ANUSUCHIT JATI SENIOR GIRLS
HOSTEL BAIDHANA DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(NONE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TRIBAL WELFARE
DEPARTMENT VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. C O M M I S S I O N E R , TRIBAL WELFARE
D EPARTM EN T SATPUDA BHAWAN, BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
3. COM M I S S I ON ER , REWA DIVISION REWA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
4. COLLECTOR, SINGRAULI DISTRICT SINGRAULI
(MADHYA PRADESH)
5. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JILA PANCHAYAT
S IN GR AULI DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA
PRADESH)
6. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TRIBAL WELFARE
DISTRICT SINGRAULI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
Signature Not Verified
SAN
(BY SHRI V. S. SHUKLA - PANEL LAWYER)
Digitally signed by MRS. LORETTA RAJ
Date: 2023.05.12 17:02:48 IST This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
2
following:
ORDER
Petitioner's contention is that since petitioner has been declared to be permanently classified employee by the Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development, Singrauli, vide order dated 29.11.2017 in terms of order dated 07.10.2016 therefore, he is entitled to benefit of judgment of Ram Naresh Rawat versus Sri Ashwini Ray & Others (2017) 3 SCC 436.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that vide GAD's circular dated 07.10.2016 there is no provision for permanent classification and is the circular regulating the services of daily wagers. Therefore, in absence of any order by the competent authority to permanently classify the petitioner,
petitioner is not entitled to benefit of law laid down by the Supreme Court in Ram Naresh Rawat (supra).
Taking these facts into consideration and also the fact that petitioner is not a permanent classified employee in terms of M.P. Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules, 1963, petitioner is not entitled to claim benefit of Ram Naresh Rawat (supra).
Therefore, petition fails and is dismissed.
(VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE Loretta
Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by MRS. LORETTA RAJ Date: 2023.05.12 17:02:48 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!