Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9206 MP
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI
ON THE 20 th OF JUNE, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 15351 of 2020
BETWEEN:-
SATYA PRAKASH KHARE S/O SHIV KUMAR KHARE,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CONTRACTUAL
EMPLOYEE 158, PRANANATH WARD NO. 6 PANNA
DISTT. PANNA M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI RAHUL DESHMUKH-ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THRO. THE
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF
TECHNICAL EDUCATION SKILL DEVELOPMENT
VALALBH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. COMMISSIONER TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND
SKILL DEVELOPMENT DISTT.BHOPAL (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3. DIRECTOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND SKILL
D EV E L O PM E N T DISTT.JABALPUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
4. JOINT DIRECTOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND
SKILL DEVELOPMENT DISTT.SAGAR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
5. SUPERINTENDENT INDUSTRIAL TRAINING
INSTITUTE DISTT.PANNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI ANSHUMAN SWAMI-PANEL LAWYER)
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
Signature Not Verified
ORDER
Signed by: ASTHA SEN Signing time: 6/21/2023 6:21:52 PM
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking quashment of order dated 15/09/2020 (Annexure P/10) by which the respondents made an effort to replace one set of contractual employee to another set of contractual employee.
2. It is contended by the counsel that on the strength of interlocutory order dated 25/11/2020, the petitioner has continued to perform his duties as a contractual employee.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the issue is no more res integra which is evident from the perusal of the judgment of Apex Court in the case of Manish Gupta and Anr. Vs. President, Jan Bhagidari Samiti and Ors. reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 485, therefore, submits
that in view of the aforesaid decision, till a regular appointment is made against the post, the petitioner being a contractual employee, has right to continue and can not be replaced with another contractual employee.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute that by virtue of interim order dated 25/11/2020, the petitioner has continued as a contractual employee.
5. In view of the aforesaid, no fruitful purpose is served, if the petition is kept pending unnecessarily.
6. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that the petitioner herein be allowed to continue as a contractual employee in Government ITI, Panna till the regular appointment is made against the said post.
7. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of.
8. Certified copy as per rules.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASTHA SEN Signing time: 6/21/2023 6:21:52 PM
(MANINDER S. BHATTI) JUDGE Astha
Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASTHA SEN Signing time: 6/21/2023 6:21:52 PM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!