Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 234 MP
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
ON THE 4 th OF JANUARY, 2023
REVIEW PETITION No. 1188 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
1. CHHIDAMILAL SHUKLA S/O LATE RAMCHANDRA
SHUKLA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
RETIRED EMPLOYEE R/O 118/, EKTA NAGAR
TEHSIL AND DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2. S M T. MUNNI BAI W/O CHHIDAMILAL SHUKLA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSE
WIFE, R/O 118 EKTA NAGAR TEHSIL AND
DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. SANDEEP KUMAR SHUKLA S/O CHHIDAMILAL
SHUKLA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
HOUSE WIFE R/O 118 EKTA NAGAR TEHSIL AND
DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI SAKET MALIK - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE
DEPARTMENT VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL
(MADHYA PRADESH)
2. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (RURAL)
JABALPUR DIVISION JABALPUR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (REVENUE) ADHARTAL
JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. THE TEHSILDAR A D H A R T A L JABALPUR
(MADHYA PRADESH)
Signature Not Verified
SAN
Digitally signed by TULSA SINGH
Date: 2023.01.05 12:31:01 IST
5. SHRI RAM DEO BABA DVELOPERS AND BUILDER
PVT. LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR SHRI. MOHAN
2
HARIKISHAN, CHANDAK RADMAWATI CHOWK,
TELEGAON ROAD, R.B. MAHARASHTRA, DISTT.
VARDHA(MAHARASHTRA)
6. SHRI ANIMESH TIWARI S/O ASHUTOSH TIWARI,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O E-11 KUTCHENY
PARISAR NEAR METRO HOSPITAL DAMOH
NAKA, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
7. PRAMOD KUMAR MISHRA S/O LATE D.S.
MISHRA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O E-11
KUTCHENY PARISAR NEAR METRO HOSPITAL
DAMOH NAKA, JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
8. SMT. ANITA MISHRA W/O PRABHAT MISHRA,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O 514 914 STATE BANK
COLONY SINGLE STORY CHERITAL WARD,
JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI MANAS MANI VERMA - GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS
NO.1 TO 4)
This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
following:
ORDER
After arguing at length, Smt. Sanjana Sahni prays for withdrawal of this review petition with a request that it may be observed that the impugned order passed by the High Court will not influence the judgment of the Trial Court and Trial Court shall decide the matter on its own merits.
This request is not opposed by Shri Manas Mani Verma, Government Advocate for the State.
Accordingly, this review petition is disposed of with a direction that there is no scope for indulgence in the review jurisdiction of this Court but at the same time Trial Court will not be influenced by any observation made in the Signature Not Verified SAN impugned order while deciding the suit which may be decided on its own Digitally signed by TULSA SINGH Date: 2023.01.05 12:31:01 IST merits.
In above terms, review petitions are disposed of.
(VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE ts
Signature Not Verified SAN
Digitally signed by TULSA SINGH Date: 2023.01.05 12:31:01 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!