Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 20660 MP
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL
ON THE 6 th OF DECEMBER, 2023
SECOND APPEAL No. 240 of 2012
BETWEEN:-
JANAB ABDUL MAJID (DEAD) THROUGH LRS
(I) MOHAMMAD DANISH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O
LATE JANAB ABDUL MAJID.
(II) SMT. RESHMA BE, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, W/O
SAMSAD BEG R/O KACHHERI MOHALLA, MANDLA,
M.P.
(III) RAZDA BE AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS D/O LATE JANAB
ABDUL MAJID
(IV) MOHAMMAD BABLA, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS S/O
LATE JANAB ABDUL MAJID
(V) SAMA BE, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS D/O LATE JANAB
ABDUL MAJID
APPLICANT NO.1,3TO 5 R/O NEAR MASJID, BIHARIJI
WARD, KHURAI, DISTT. SAGAR M.P.
.....APPELLANTS
(BY SHRI RAVI RANJAN WITH SHRI SUSHANT RANJAN, ADVOCATES)
AND
1. SMT. SHAMSUN BI (D) TH. HER LRS. IDRISH
OCCUPATION: SHOP KEEPER KHURAI DISTT.
SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. IDRISH S/O LATE DR. YASIN MOHAMMAD, AGED
ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SHOPKEEPAR
KHURAI, DISTT. SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. INTYAZ S/O LATE DR. YASIN MOHAMMAD, AGED
ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DOCTOR
KHURAI, DISTT. SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. RIYAZ S/O LATE DR. YASIN MOHAMMAD, AGED
ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SHOP KEEPER
KHURAI, DISTT. SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. SIRAZ S/O LATE DR. YASIN MOHAMMAD, AGED
ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SHOPKEEPAR
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: KUMARI PALLAVI
SINHA
Signing time: 12/7/2023
6:19:04 PM
2
KHURAI, DISTT. SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
6. SAHEEN W/O ABDUL RASID, AGED ABOUT 32
YEAR S , OCCUPATION: HOUSE WIFE KHURAI,
DISTT. SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
7. SHABEENA W/O TALAT MOHAMMAD, AGED
ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSE WIFE
KHURAI, DISTT. SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI AJAY KUMAR JAIN, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT 2)
This appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the court passed the
following:
ORDER
This second appeal has been preferred by the
appellants/defendants/tenants challenging the judgment & decree dtd.24.01.2012 passed by 1st Addl. District Judge, Khurai, District Sagar in Civil Appeal No.4A/11 affirming the judgment & decree dtd. 20.12.2010 passed by 1st Civil Judge Class-I, Khurai, District Sagar in Civil Suit No.82A/2006 whereby respondents/plaintiffs' suit for eviction filed on several grounds available under Section 12(1) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (in short "the Act"), has been decreed on the grounds under Section 12(1)(e) and (h) of the Act.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants/defendants/tenants submits that day before yesterday i.e. on 04.12.2023 another person namely Tufel Rayen, who is claiming himself to be owner of the suit property, has dispossessed the appellants/defendants forcibly, therefore, he wants to withdraw this second appeal with liberty to file appropriate suit seeking relief of restoration of possession against the said person.
3. Prayer being reasonable is accepted and declining interference in the
judgment & decree passed by learned Courts below, this second appeal is permitted to be withdrawn and is hereby disposed off with the aforesaid liberty.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed off.
(DWARKA DHISH BANSAL) JUDGE KPS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!