Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Manranjan Kaur Batra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr
2023 Latest Caselaw 13149 MP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13149 MP
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2023

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Smt. Manranjan Kaur Batra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr on 14 August, 2023
Author: Anand Pathak
                                                       1
                                IN    THE     HIGH COURT OF MADHYA
                                                  PRADESH
                                                AT GWALIOR
                                                   BEFORE
                                     HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK
                                           ON THE 14 th OF AUGUST, 2023
                                          WRIT PETITION No. 3317 of 2018

                          BETWEEN:-
                          SMT. MANRANJAN KAUR BATRA W/O SHRI
                          SARDAR DILEEP SINGH BATRA, AGED 63 YEARS,
                          OCCUPATION: PENSIONER (RETIRED FROM
                          UPPER DIVISION TEACHER) R/O MAHAVIR NAGAR
                          COLONY GURUDWAR KE PICHHE SHIVPURI,
                          DISTRICT SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                           .....PETITIONER
                          (BY SHRI NEERAJ SHRIVASTAVA- ADVOCATE)

                          AND
                          1.    THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                THROUGH       PRINCIPAL   SECRETARY,
                                DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, GOVT. OF
                                M.P. VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA
                                PRADESH)

                          2.    ZILA SHIKSHA ADHIKARI          EDUCATION
                                D E P A R T M E N T SHIVPURI     (MADHYA
                                PRADESH)

                          3.    URBAN         ADMINISTRATION     AND
                                DEVELOPMENT GWALIOR EVAM CHAMBAL
                                S A M B H A G MOTI   MAHAL   GWALIOR
                                (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          4.    ZILA  PENSION    ADHIKARI       DISTRICT
                                SHIVPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)

                          5.    ZILA   KOSHALAYA    ADHIKARI    ZILA
                                KOSHALAYA ADHIKARI SHIVPURI DISTRICT
                                SHVIPURI (MADHYA PRADESH)




Signature Not Verified
Signed by: VISHAL
UPADHYAY
Signing time: 8/16/2023
11:26:18 AM
                                                     2
                          6.    SANKUL      PRABHARI/     PRACHARYA
                                EDUCATION       DEPARTMENT SHASKIYA
                                UCHATAR MADHYAMIK VIDHYALAYA NO. 2,
                                SHIVPURI, DISTRICT SHIVPURI (MADHYA
                                PRADESH)

                                                                                           .....RESPONDENTS
                          (BY SHRI NILESH TOMAR- GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR
                          RESPONDENT/STATE.)

                                This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed
                          the following:
                                                                ORDER

The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking following relief:-

" 7-1 fiVh'kuj dh fiVh'ku dks Lohdkj djrs gq, mldks iznku fd;s x;s lsokfgr ykHkksas es ls vf/kd Hkqxrku dh olwyh :i;s 2]19]189@& ¼nks yk[k mUuhl gtkj ,d lkS uoklh :i;s½ dks ekuuh; U;k;ky; }kjk fn;s x;s leku fn'kk funZs'kksa ds dze esa lekurk ls C;kt lfgr 30 fnol esa Hkqxrku dj okfil iznku fd;s tkus ds funsZ'k& vkns'k jsLiksaMsaV~l foHkkxh; izkf/kdkfj;ks dks iznku djus dh d`ik U;k;fgr esa djsA 7-2 vU; mfpr fjV] vkns'k vFkok funZs'k U;k;kfgr es fiVh'kuj ds i{k esa tkjh djus dh d`ik djsa] izdj.k O;; jsLiksaMsaV~l fnyk;s tkus fd d`ik djsaA^^

It is the submission of learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner was working as Upper Division Teacher (U.D.T.) at a relevant point of time and due to attainment of first and second Kramonnati, she was given payment which was excess in nature contrary to the increment which she deserved. However, due to error in calculation, said amount has been disbursed in which neither petitioner made any misrepresentation, nor she gave any undertaking, so as to attract recovery. Learned counsel for

Signature Not Verified Signed by: VISHAL UPADHYAY Signing time: 8/16/2023 11:26:18 AM

petitioner relied upon the Judgment of Apex Court in the cases of State of Punjab and others Vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer), 2015 (1), MPHT 130 (SC) Para11, Thomas Deniel Vs. State of Kerala and others 2022 SCC Online SC 536 and High Court of Punjab and Haryana & others Vs. Jagdev Singh reported in 2016 SCC Online SC 748 and sought parity.

Learned counsel for respondent/State opposed the prayer and submitted that due to calculation mistake, some extra benefits were given to the petitioner which were not legitimately payable to her. Therefore the said amount has been recovered. There is no arbitrariness or illegality.

Heard counsel for the rival parties and perused the documents appended thereto.

This is a case where petitioner, a lady aged 63 years, was a UDT at the relevant point of time and she got increments due to kramonnati. Therefore, any benefits extended to her were not because of misrepresentation of petitioner or concealment of any facts.

In the case of Rafiq Masih (supra), Thomas Daniel (Supra) and Jagdev Singh (supra), it has been held that if petitioner does not misrepresent and has not given any undertaking, then no recovery can be issued against her. Here, in the present case, respondents failed to refer any undertaking given by petitioner. Similarly, petitioner did not misrepresent and was not instrumental in concealment of any facts.

Therefore, the instant petition stands allowed and impugned order dated 26.09.2017 (Annexure P/1) is set aside. Since recovery has already been

Signature Not Verified Signed by: VISHAL UPADHYAY Signing time: 8/16/2023 11:26:18 AM

made by the respondents, therefore, recovered amount be returned back to the petitioner within a period of four months.

(ANAND PATHAK) JUDGE Vishal

Signature Not Verified Signed by: VISHAL UPADHYAY Signing time: 8/16/2023 11:26:18 AM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter