Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12576 MP
Judgement Date : 20 September, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)
ON THE 20th OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 14126 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH STATION
HOUSE OFFICER THROUGH POLICE STATION
KALIDEVI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(MR. HEMANT SHARMA, P.L APPEARING ON BEHALF OF
ADVOCATE GENERAL.
AND
1. VESHIYA BHURIYA S/O PIDIYA @ KIDIYA, AGED
ABOUT 64 YEARS, GRAM MARGAUNDI P.S. KALI
DEVI (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. AKARM S/O PIDIYA UFF KIDIYA, AGED ABOUT
59 YEARS, GRAM MAGRARUDI POLICE THANA
KALI DEVI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(NONE)
This application coming on for ADMISSION this day, t h e court
passed the following:
ORDER
This petition has been filed under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. for grant o f leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 15.12.2021 passed by Special Judge, NDPS Act District Jhabua in Special S.T. No.02/2021 under Sections 8/20(a)(1) r/w Section 20(b)(ii) of NDPS Act.
Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by SAN AMIT KUMAR A s per the prosecution story, on 23.11.2016, on a discreet Date: 2022.09.21 16:24:08 IST
information, the police has the police team has seized 280 plants of ganja
and registered the case against the respondents.
Learned counsel for the State submits that the learned trial court without any appreciation much less proper appreciation, scrutiny and marshaling of oral and documentary evidence adduced on behalf of the parties, erred in acquitting the respondents/accused from the offences under the NDPS Act. It is further submitted that the learned Trial court has erred in disbelieving the statements of the witnesses and the Court below has acquitted the respondents even after ample evidence against them regarding the fact that they were cultivating the cannabis trees. Hence, the learned Court below has wrongly acquitted the respondent from the aforesaid
charges. Hence, prays for grant of leave to the appeal.
I have heard the counsel for the parties and perused the record. On perusal of the record, it is crystal clear that the prosecution has failed to establish the exclusive possession of the land on which the alleged cannabis plants were being produced . In the the testimony of PW- 12 Patwari Premsingh Baghel is found that respondents are not in exclusive possession of the land is question. Hence, the learned trial Court has not committed any error of law and facts in acquitting the respondents. Admission is declined. The MCRC stands dismissed.
(RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)) JUDGE amit Signature Not Verified VerifiedDigitally Digitally signed by SAN AMIT KUMAR Date: 2022.09.21 16:24:08 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!