Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rakesh Tanwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 14068 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14068 MP
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Rakesh Tanwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 November, 2022
Author: Vivek Rusia
                                 - : 1 :-
                                                           CRA No. 1/2014



         HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: BENCH INDORE
   BEFORE DIVISION BENCH OF HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK
   RUSIA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI)
                           CRA No. 1 of 2014
      (Rakesh Tanwar S/o. Manohar Tanwar. V/s. State of M.P.)
Date: 01.11.2022 :
      Smt. Sudha Shrivastava, learned counsel for the appellant.
      Shri Bhaskar Agrawal, Govt. Advocate, learned Govt. Advocate
for respondent/State.

Heard on I.A. No.6748/2022, a repeat (6th) application under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail filed on behalf of the appellant. This repeat application has been filed after completion of 10 years incarceration and also on the ground that there is no possibility of final hearing of the appeal in near future.

Vide judgment dated 6.12.2013 passed by 11th Addl. Sessions Judge, Indore in S.T. No.795/2008 the appellant stands convicted and sentenced as under :

Offence U/s. Sentence. Fine (Rs.) In lieu of payment of Fine amount.

302/149 of IPC. Life Imprisonment. 1000/- 3 months RI.

As per prosecution story, the deceased was President of Tirupati Nagar Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti and he was not executing the sale- deed of Plot No. 114 in favour of the present appellant. He was threatened by the appellant and others for execution of the sale-deed. On 6.8.2008 near about at 9 pm. the deceased was assaulted by 7 persons. He was taken to the hospital where he was declared brought

- : 2 :-

CRA No. 1/2014

dead. Before the death, he disclosed the name of present appellant and one Babulal Sankhla. However, the investigation has revealed that other 5 persons were also involved in the said crime, therefore, they were also tried u/s. 302 with the aid of Section 149 of the IPC and u/s. 25 of the Arms Act. After completion of the trial, learned Addl. Sessions Judge has acquitted other 5 accused and held that Babulal Sankhla and present appellant were involved in assaulting the deceased by means of knife. Accused Babulal Sankhla died during trial, hence present appellant alone has been convicted u/s. 302 with the aid of Section 149 of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there are various omissions and contradictions in the statement of witnesses. When the deceased was brought dead in the hospital, then it cannot be said that he was alive to disclose the name of present appellant. When the blood stained knife were recovered from the other accused and they have been acquitted, then it cannot be said that the deceased died because of the assault done by the present appellant. The present appellant alone has been convicted u/s. 302 with the aid of Section 149 of the IPC which is not permissible. This appeal is of the year 2014 and there is no likelihood of its final hearing in near future. She, therefore, prayed for grant of suspension and release the appellant on bail.

On the other hand, learned Govt. Advocate opposes the application and prays for rejection of the same.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, in the considered opinion of this Court, the jail sentence of appellant deserves to be suspended.

- : 3 :-

CRA No. 1/2014

Accordingly, I.A. No.6748/2022 is allowed and it is directed that subject to deposit of fine amount, if already not deposited, with the trial Court and on furnishing personal bond by the appellant - Rakesh Tanwar in the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Forty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before the Registry of this Court on 21.12.2022 and on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this behalf, during pendency of this appeal. I.A. No.9603/2022, an application for urgent hearing stands disposed of.

List for final hearing in due course.

C.C. as per rules.

         [ VIVEK RUSIA ]           [AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI)]
             JUDGE.                        JUDGE.
Alok/-
 Digitally signed by ALOK GARGAV
 Date: 2022.11.02 10:15:12 +05'30'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter