Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7357 MP
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE LOK ADALAT
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ROHIT ARYA
&
SHRI R. D. JAIN , SENIOR ADVOCATE
ON THE 14th OF MAY, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 22052 of 2019
Between:-
SUDHEER KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA, AGE-ABOUT
62 YEARS S/O SHRI KOMAR PRASAD,
OCCUPATION-PENSIONER (RETIRED
ACCOUNTANT GOVERNMENT HIGHER
SECONDARY SCHOOL NATERAN DISTRICT
VIDISHA, SANKUL KENDRA GOVERNMENT
HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL NATERAN,
DISTRICT VIDISHA D.D.O. BLOCK EDUCATION
OFFICER, NATERAN, DISTRICT VIDISHA (M.P.),
R/O 24- GYANDEEP BHAWAN, SAKET NAGAR,
NEAR JAIN COLLEGE, HARIPURA, VIDISHA,
DISTRICT VIDISHA (M.P.)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI NEERAJ SHRIVASTAVA- ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA
PRADESH, VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (M.P.)
2. DIVISIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR, PUBLIC
INSTRUCTIONS (SCHOOL EDUCATION) BHOPAL
DIVISION, GOVERNMENT SAMRAT ASHOK
MIDDLE SCHOOL CAMPUS, T.T. NAGAR
BHOPAL (M.P.)
3. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, VIDISHA,
DISTRICT VIDISHA (M.P.)
4. DIVISIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR
TREASURY-ACCOUNTS, BHOPAL DIVISION,
SATPURA BHAWAN, BHOPAL (M.P.)
5. DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER DISTRICT
VIDISHA (M.P.)
2
6. DISTRICT PENSION OFFICER, DISTRICT
VIDISHA (M.P.)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI RAJEEV UPADHYAYA -GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
This petition coming on for conciliation this day, the Bench passed the
following:
ORDER
The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred against the inaction on the part of the respondents; whereby, Kramonnati/Samaymaan and arrears are not being given to the petitioner.
Petitioner's contention is that petitioner is denied benefit of
Kramonnati/samaymaan merely because he had refused to accept promotion. It is submitted that this issue is already dealt with, in the case of Smt. Priti Bhattacharya Vs. State of M.P and others (Writ Petition No.12030/2016 decided on 19/12/2017) whereby it is held in the light of the law laid down in the case of State of M.P. and another Vs.Trilok Chand Gupta (2010) 4 MPLJ 266 (M.P.) that refusal to join at transferred place on promotion could not have any adverse impact on the benefits of higher pay scale arising out of Kramonnati/samaymaan.
It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of such facts, the petition was allowed and respondents were directed to extend all the benefits of Kramonnati/Samaymaan to the petitioner within a period of 60 days from the date of production of copy of the order and the said order further directed that petitioner shall be entitled to interest on the delayed payment in consonance with the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India Vs. S.S.Sandhawalia (1994) 2 SCC 240.
Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction that let petitioner's claim for Kramonnati/Samaymaan be decided on its own merits. In case, petitioner files a copy of this writ petition and a copy of the order being passed today along with the representation within thirty days from today before the respondents, then his representation be decided within a further period of 60 days from the date of receipt of such representation and arrears be paid within the aforesaid time failing which arrears will be payable along with interest @ 9 %.
(ROHIT ARYA) (R. D. JAIN)
MEMBER MEMBER
pd
PAWAN Digitally signed by PAWAN DHARKAR
DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA
PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT
OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR,
DHARKA
postalCode=474001, st=Madhya Pradesh,
2.5.4.20=5da1b3ce5c6aee672b1f51a5cff5661c 113046ab7ebb8031c36dcac4472c040a, pseudonym=22FE9CB9F7CF0345E7FFAC9031E 38DF6A29B4C10,
R serialNumber=C72B9531562BC6028F5D6E42E 82477C85878470B30E4A7672CCA523E83C0BC B9, cn=PAWAN DHARKAR Date: 2022.05.19 13:42:26 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!