Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9508 MP
Judgement Date : 12 July, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
ON THE 12th OF JULY, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 15054 of 2022
Between:-
DR. SMT. RASHMI PANWAR W/O DR. PRADEEP
S. PANWAR , AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
OCCUPATION: SERVICE 4,UGC QUARTERS,
JAORA, TEHSIL JAORA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI L. C. PATNE, LEARNED COUNSEL)
AND
1. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION
THROUGHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE
GOVT. OFM.P. VALLABH BHAWAN DISTRICT
BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. COMMISSIONER OF HIGHER EDUCATION
SATPURA BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA
PRADESH)
3. PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT BHAGAT SINGH PG
COLLEGE, JAORA, TEHSIL JAORA (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI N.S. BHATI, LEARNED GOVT. ADVOCATE)
T h is petition coming on for orders this day, t h e cou rt passed the
following:
ORDER
The petitioner is aggrieved with inaction on the part of the respondents in not extending the benefit of pay band IV i.e. placement in the pay scale of Rs. Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by SAN SOUMYA RANJAN DALAI 37400-67000/- + AGP 9000/- w.e.f. 1.1.2006 instead the same has been Date: 2022.07.12 17:39:29 IST
conferred upon the petitioner w.e.f. 27.7.2006, by notionally considering the
date of grant of selection grade pay scale of Rs. 12000-18300/- to the petitioner w.e.f. 27.7.2003 i.e. after completion of 5 years of service in the senior grade pay scale whereas in the light of the judgment of this Hon'ble Court in the case of Dr. Pradeep S. Panwar v. State of M.P. & Others [W.P. No. 2020/2016, decided on 4.10.2018] as also in terms of Circular dated 13.12.2019, the petitioner was rightly conferred with the benefit of selection grade pay scale of Rs.12000-183000/- after completion of 9 years of service with Ph.D. Degree i.e. w.e.f. 22.10.2000 and various similarly situated persons have been conferred benefit of pay band IV w.e.f. 1.1.2006, pursuant to command of this Hon'ble Court.
The petitioner has submitted representation to the respondent No.2, but the same has not been decided.
Counsel for the State submits that the representation of the petitioner shall be considered and decided by the respondent No.2 in accordance with the law.
Considering the aforesaid submissions, as agreed to, the present petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh detailed and comprehensive representation before the respondent No.2 along with the copy of the judgment passed by the High Court in the case of Dr. Pradeep S. Panwar (supra) and also copy of the order passed today in the writ petition within 15 days from today and if such representation is submitted within the aforesaid period, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent No.2 within a period of two months from the date of submission of the representation.
Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by SAN SOUMYA RANJAN DALAI Date: 2022.07.12 17:39:29 IST With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed off.
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE soumya
Signature Not Verified VerifiedDigitally Digitally signed by SAN SOUMYA RANJAN DALAI Date: 2022.07.12 17:39:29 IST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!