Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2379 MP
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2022
1 Cr.R.3616-2021
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH INDORE
Cr.R. No.3616 of 2021
( AJAY Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
Indore, Dated: 21/02/2022
Shri Yashpal Rathore, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Vaibhav Bhagawat, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
Additional Advocate General.
Shri Rajeev Bhatijiwale, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
Record of the lower court is available.
Heard on I.A. No.78/2022, which is an application for exemption
from surrender filed on behalf of the petitioner and I.A.No.30690/2021,
which is the first application under Section 397 of the Cr.P.C. for
suspension of jail sentence.
The petitioner has been convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge
(Electricity Act), Indore(M.P.) vide judgment dated 31.3.2021 passed in
Criminal Appeal No.323/2016 and sentenced them as under:-
Conviction Sentence
Section Act Imprisonment Fine Imprisonment
in lieu of fine
471 IPC 03 years RI 10,000/- 03 months RI
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that initially the trial
court has acquitted the present petitioner from the offences vide its
judgment dated 25.2.2016. However, on an appeal preferred by the private
respondent No.2 as also by the State the same has been reversed and now
the petitioner stands convicted as mentioned above by the lower appellate 2 Cr.R.3616-2021
court vide its judgment dated 31.8.2021. It is further submitted that the
during the course of the trial the petitioner was on bail and in fact this is the
first revision petition preferred by the petitioner after his conviction by the
lower appellate court. Thus, it is submitted the petitioner be exempted from
surrender and the application for suspension be also allowed.
In support of his contention, Shri Yashpal Rathore has filed a copy of
the order passed by this Court in Cr.R.No.1239/2021 dated 27.8.2021
wherein it is held that such exemption can be granted to a person in
exceptional circumstances.
Shri Rajeev Bhatjiwale, counsel for the respondent No.2 has opposed
the prayer.
Counsel for the State has also opposed the prayer.
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties and facts
and circumstances of the case and on perusal of the record including the
order passed by this Court in Cr.R.No.1239/2021 dated 27.8.2021, this
Court finds that under the peculiar facts and circumstances it is a fit case to
grant exemption to the petitioner from surrendering before the trial court.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case,
I.A.No.78/2022, the application for exemption from surrender of the
petitioner and IA No.30690/2021, first application for suspension of jail
sentence filed on behalf of petitioner are allowed and it is directed that the
execution of jail sentence awarded to the petitioner shall remain suspended 3 Cr.R.3616-2021
upon furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty
Five Thousand only) each with one solvent surety in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before trial Court on
29.04.2022 and on such other dates as may be fixed by the concerned Court
in this regard.
Office is directed to reflect the name of Shri Rajeev Bhatjiwale,
counsel on behalf of the respondent No.2 in the daily case list.
Certified copy, as per rules.
(Subodh Abhayankar) JUDGE
moni Digitally signed by MONI RAJU Date: 2022.02.21 14:46:11 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!