Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2001 MP
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2022
1 CRA No.1491/2022
High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
Bench at Indore
Criminal Appeal No.1491/2022
Indore, Dated 14.02.2022
Shri Rituraj R. Bhatnagar, learned counsel for appellant No.1 Darbar
Singh s/o Bhim Singh Rajput, appellant No.2 Virendra Singh s/o Bhagwan
Singh Rajput, appellant No.3 Toofan Singh s/o Bhagwan Singh Rajput,
appellant No.4 Baje Singh s/o Bhim Singh Rajput, appellant No.5 Rajendra
Singh s/o Bhagwan Singh Rajput, appellant No.6 Narayan Singh s/o Karan
Singh Rajput and appellant No.7 Jitendra Singh s/o Karan Singh Rajput.
Smt. Mamta Shandilya, learned Government Advocate for the
respondent / State of Madhya Pradesh, on advance notice.
Heard on IA No.2188/2022, first application under Section 389 (1) of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for suspension of jail sentence and
grant of bail filed on behalf of the appellants.
The present appellants have been convicted and sentenced by learned
Additional Sessions Judge, Bhanpura, District Mandsaur (MP) in Sessions
Trial No.CIS ST/28/2016 vide judgment dated 29 th January, 2022, as under:
-
Conviction Sentence
Section Act RI Fine Imprisonment in lieu of fine
amount
148 IPC 2 years Rs.1,000/- 1 month RI
323 r/w 149 IPC 1 year Rs.500/- 1 month RI
Counsel for the appellants has submitted that the appellants were on
bail during the trial and they did not misuse the liberty so granted to them.
After conviction, the jail sentence of the appellants has already been
suspended by the trial Court itself up to 28.02.2022. It is further submitted
that short sentence of two years RI has been imposed on each of the
appellants and there are fair chances of success in the appeal and there is no
possibility of early disposal of this appeal in near future and if the sentence
is not suspended, then the present appeal filed by the appellant (s) may turn
infructuous. Under these circumstances and looking to the short sentence
imposed on the appellants, counsel for the appellants prays for suspension
of jail sentence of the appellants and grant of bail to them.
Counsel for the respondent / State of Madhya Pradesh, on the other
hand, opposed the application by submitting that no sufficient ground is
made out for releasing the appellants on bail; hence the application filed by
the appellants be dismissed.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the
arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties as also looking to the
short sentence of three years RI awarded to them, this Court is of the
considered opinion that the application for suspension of custodial sentence
deserves to be allowed.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case,
IA No.2188/2022 is allowed, subject to depositing the fine amount, if any,
and it is directed that on furnishing a personal bond by each of the appellant
in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with a solvent
surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, for his
/ her regular appearance before concerned trial Court, the execution of the
custodial part of the sentence imposed against the appellant (s) shall remain
suspended, till the final disposal of this appeal.
The appellant (s), after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his / her
presence before the concerned trial Court on 11.05.2022 and on all such
subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the concerned Court in this regard.
Let the record (physical) of the case from the concerned trial Court be
requisitioned; and list the matter on the question of admission along with
Criminal Appeal No.1492/2022 for analogous hearing.
C. c. as per rules.
(Subodh Abhyankar) Judge rcp
RAMESH CHANDRA PITHWE 2022.02.14 17:48:10 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!