Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1636 MP
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2022
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.6277/2022
(RAMCHARAN VS. STATE OF M.P.)
Through Video Conferencing
Gwalior, Dated : 04/02/2022
Shri Shailendra Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri C.P.Singh, learned counsel for the State.
Case diary is available.
This first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been
filed for grant of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 11/05/2021 in connection
with Crime No.77/2021 registered by Police Station Jamner, District
Guna for offence punishable under Sections 326, 436, 294, 323, 324,
506 and 34 of IPC.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that according
to the prosecution case, the applicant had assaulted the injured
Mukesh on his head by a Farsi and also set the houses of Komal
Singh, Ranglal and Nepal Singh on fire, as a result extensive damage
was caused to their belongings. The applicant is in jail from
11/05/2021
i.e. more than 8 months. The Trial is likely to take
sufficiently long time and there is no possibility of his absconding or
tampering with the prosecution case.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
counsel for the State. It is submitted that the applicant had not only
assaulted complainant Mukesh, but also set the houses of Mukesh,
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.6277/2022 (RAMCHARAN VS. STATE OF M.P.)
Komal Singh, Ranglal and Nepal Singh on fire causing loss of rupees
more than Rs.2,00,000/-, which is evident from the Nuksani
Panchnama. Furthermore, the applicant has a criminal history and
three more cases were registered against him, including one under
Section 307 of IPC.
Considering the period of detention as well as considering the
extent of loss cause to Komal Singh, Ranglal and Nepal Singh as
well as Mukesh, this Court is of the considered opinion that the
applicant can be granted bail only on stringent condition.
Accordingly, it is directed that in case, if the applicant deposits an
amount of Rs.2,00,000/- without any prejudice to his defence and on
furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One
Lac) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial
Court/Committal Court to appear before the Court on the dates given
by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in case
of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
The deposit of an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- shall be
condition precedent for release of the applicant. It is made clear
that the said amount shall be distributed amongst the victims as
per the loss sustained by them. It is made clear that this deposit
of amount is without any prejudice to the defence of the
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.6277/2022 (RAMCHARAN VS. STATE OF M.P.)
applicant. The amount in favour of the victims shall be released
only after obtaining undertaking from them that in case, if the
applicant is acquitted, then the amount so released in their favour
shall be returned by them.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in
the case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
With aforesaid observation, the application is allowed.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia)
Pj'S/- Judge
Digitally signed by
PRINCEE BARAIYA
Date: 2022.02.04
15:05:47 -08'00'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!