Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5853 MP
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2021
1
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE
Cr. A. No.4097 of 2021
Paramjeet Singh Dewda Vs. State of M.P.
Indore, Dated:- 22/09/2021
Shri Rajat Raghuwanshi, Counsel for the appellant - Paramjeet
Singh Dewda S/o Brijmohan Singh Devda.
Ms. Geetanjali Chourasiya, Counsel for the respondent/State.
Ms. Swati Sharma, Counsel for the objector.
Heard on IA No.24582/2021, second application under Section 389
(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for suspension of jail sentence
and grant of bail filed on behalf of the appellant.
The present appellant has been convicted and sentenced by Special
Judge (O.A.W.), Indore (MP) in Sessions Case No.1401101/2015 vide
judgment dated 30.06.2021, as under:
Conviction Sentence
Section Act RI Fine Imprisonment in
amount lieu of fine
376(1) IPC, 1860 07 years Rs.5000/- 6 months RI
506-II IPC, 1860 02 years Rs.3000/- 2 months RI
342 IPC, 1860 01 year Rs.1000/- 2 months RI
Counsel for the appellant has submitted that earlier the appellant's
first application I.A. No.18368 of 2021 for temporary suspension was
allowed by this Court on 22.07.2021 for a period of five days only so that
to allow him to participate in the B.Ed. 4 th semester examination and
MPPSC examination and after the completion of the bail period, he has
also surrendered before the Trial Court on 26.07.2021.
So far as the present application is concerned, Counsel for the
appellant has submitted that the prosecutrix was major and was a
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE Cr. A. No.4097 of 2021 Paramjeet Singh Dewda Vs. State of M.P.
consenting party. It is further submitted that the prosecutrix has also filed
an application for compromise under Section 320 of Cr.P.C. along with the
affidavit and has expressed her no objection if the application for
suspension of sentence is allowed. Counsel for the appellant has further
submitted that the final disposal of the appeal is likely to take sufficient
long time and there are material omissions and contradictions in the
statements of the witnesses.
Counsel for the objector/complainant, on the other hand, has not
opposed the prayer and it is submitted that she has no objection if the
application for suspension of sentence is allowed.
Counsel for the respondent/State, however, has opposed the prayer.
On due consideration of submissions and on perusal of the record,
considering the fact that the prosecutrix has no objection if the application
for suspension of sentence is allowed and on earlier occasion when the
appellant was granted temporary suspension, he has not misused the liberty
extended to him and the fact that the final disposal of the appeal is likely to
take sufficient long time, this Court is of the considered opinion that the
application for suspension of custodial sentence deserves to be allowed.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case,
IA No.24582/2021 is allowed and it is directed that on furnishing a
personal bond by the appellant Paramjeet Singh Dewda in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with a solvent surety in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, for his / her regular
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : BENCH AT INDORE Cr. A. No.4097 of 2021 Paramjeet Singh Dewda Vs. State of M.P.
appearance before concerned trial Court, the execution of the custodial
part of the sentence imposed against the appellant shall remain suspended,
till the final disposal of this appeal.
The appellant after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his presence
before the concerned trial Court on 17.12.2021 and on all such subsequent
dates, as may be fixed by the concerned Court in this regard.
C. c. as per rules.
(SUBODH ABHYANKAR) JUDGE Pankaj Digitally signed by PANKAJ PANDEY Date: 2021.09.22 17:54:27 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!