Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5634 MP
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2021
1 Cra.1724.2018
The High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Cra.1724.2018
[Akash @ Tunda Vs. State of M.P.]
Gwalior dated 17.09.2021
Shri Atul Gupta, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Devendra Choubey, learned Public Prosecutor for
respondent/State.
IA.6968/2019 second repeat application u/Sec.389(1)
Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and grant of bail moved on
behalf of sole appellant after dismissal of earlier one as withdrawn
vide order dated 02.05.2018 (IA.1482/2018) without being
considered on merits is taken up and considered.
This criminal appeal assails the judgment dated 02.02.2018
passed in ST.No.61/2017 by II Additional Sessions Judge, Vidisha
(M.P.) whereby appellant has been convicted and sentenced as
under with default stipulation :-
Sections Imprisonment Fine
302/34 IPC Life Imprisonment Rs.500/- with default
stipulation
Learned counsel for the State opposed the application and
prayed for its rejection by contending that on the basis of the
allegations and the material available on record, no case for
suspension of sentence is made out.
The case of appellant is of causing knife blows to the
deceased who died due to stab injuries inflicted.
Learned counsel for appellant submits that none of the
eyewitnesses has supported the story of prosecution. Conviction is 2 Cra.1724.2018
solely based on circumstantial evidence which in turn is founded
upon recovery of offending weapon which is knife on the behest
of discovery statement of appellant. It is, however, submitted that
this seizure of weapon has not been proved by the seizure witness.
As regards antecedents shown in the reply, appellant has
filed two judgments wherein he has been acquitted of the offence
of robbery and attempt to murder.
Considering the fact that the appellant has suffered five
years' custody, no useful purpose would be served to continue
incarceration of petitioner as there is no likelihood of early
disposal of the present appeal in the near future, without entering
into the merits of the matter, this Court is inclined to grant bail to
appellant by way of suspension of sentence.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits,
IA.6968/2019 is allowed and it is directed that the jail sentence
of appellant will remain under suspension subject to verification
that the amount of fine has been deposited, on appellant
furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand
Only) with two solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of concerned CJM for his appearance before her/him
on 08.02.2022 and on such further dates as may be fixed by
her/him which shall be of frequency not less than once a year.
In case, appellant is found absent on any date fixed by the
concerned CJM then the concerned CJM shall be free to issue and
execute warrant of arrest for securing his presence without first 3 Cra.1724.2018
referring the matter to this Court, provided the Registry of this
Court is kept informed.
The learned concerned Magistrate and the prosecution are
directed to ensure following of Covid-19 precautionary protocol
prescribed from time to time by the Supreme Court, the Central
Govt. and as well as the State Govt. during release, travel and
residence of the appellant during period of suspension of sentence
as a consequence of this order.
A copy of this order be sent to the court below for
compliance.
C.c. as per rules.
(Sheel Nagu) (Anand Pathak)
Judge Judge
pd
Digitally signed by PAWAN
PAWAN
DHARKAR
DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF
MADHYA PRADESH BENCH
GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT OF
DHARK
MADHYA PRADESH BENCH
GWALIOR, postalCode=474011,
st=Madhya Pradesh,
2.5.4.20=345b3604d572ed9dd1
AR
492fe82dc3b1eef67eff2cb59f3a
c97e920ac264de7828,
cn=PAWAN DHARKAR
Date: 2021.09.17 17:56:43
+05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!