Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6902 MP
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2021
1
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR MADHYA PRADESH,
AT JABALPUR
(DIVISION BENCH)
W.A.No.982 /2021
Mehendra Prasad Tiwari Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh and others ...Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram :
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla, Judge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence :
Shri A.K.Dwivedi, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Swapnil Ganguly, Deputy Advocate General for the
respondents/State.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
(27/10/2021)
Per : V.K. Shukla, J.
The present intra court appeal has been filed under Section 2(1) of
Madhya Pradesh Uccha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal)
Adhiniyam, 2005, being aggrieved by the order dated 01-10-2021 passed
in W.P. No.15279/2021 whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant
has been dismissed.
2. The appellant challenged the order dated 06-08-2021, whereby he
has been directed to be transferred from Government Higher Secondary
School Ledhra to Government High School Sulkhari, District Anuppur.
3. The challenge has been made on the ground that in the school
where the appellant has been transferred only two teachers are working
and if he is transferred then the students would suffer and their studies
would be affected. Who should be posted where cannot be decided by
the appellant and it is within the domain of the employer to post any
employee. The appellant is working as Incharge Principal in the
Government Higher Secondary School, Ledhra and he has been
transferred only 80 kms. away from the present place of posting.
4. That the learned Single Judge has rightly refused to interfere in
the writ petition against the transfer and held that the scope of
interference in the transfer order is only when the transfer order suffers
from malafide, arbitrary exercise of power or the transfer order is
issued by an incompetent authority. In the present case, the appellant
has failed to make out any such ground for challenging the transfer
order.
5. In view of the aforesaid, we do not find any illegality in the order
passed by the learned Single Judge warranting any interference in the
intra court appeal. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed.
(RAVI MALIMATH) (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)
CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE
hsp
Digitally signed by
HARSAHAI PATERIYA
Date: 2021.10.29
16:44:11 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!