Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6805 MP
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2021
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.51826/2021 (PRAMOD SHIVHARE VS. STATE OF M.P.)
Gwalior dtd. 25/10/2021
Shri Anil Jha, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri C.P.Singh, learned counsel for the State.
Case diary is available.
This is first bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
for grant of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 08/09/2021 in connection
with Crime No.151/2021 registered by Police Station Dehat Dabra,
District Gwalior for offence punishable under Section 34(2) and 49-
A of Excise Act.
It is submitted that according to the prosecution case house of
co-accused Gurpreet Singh was raided and 3,492 liters of country
made liquor as well as various machines, which are used for sealing
the bottles as well as various cartons and other utensils for
manufacturing of country made liquor were seized. The said
premises belongs to co-accused Gurpreet Singh. It is submitted that
only evidence against the applicant is confessional statement made
by Gurpreet Singh under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, which is
to the effect that the applicant used to supply packing material as
well as the order for manufacturing liquor. However, the applicant
is in jail for the last more than one month and nothing incriminating
has been seized from his possession to show his involvement in the
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.51826/2021 (PRAMOD SHIVHARE VS. STATE OF M.P.)
offence. It is further submitted that the confessional statement made
by the co-accused under Section 27 of the Evidence Act is not
admissible in the light of Sections 25 and 26 of Evidence Act. The
Trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is no
possibility of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution
case.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
counsel for the State. However, after going through the police case
diary, it is fairly conceded that nothing has been seized from the
possession of the applicant to show any incriminating evidence
against him. It is fairly conceded that except the statement of the
co-accused recorded under Section 27 of Evidence Act, there is no
material against the applicant to show his involvement. However, it
is further submitted that the applicant has criminal history and as
many as seven more criminal cases have been registered against
him, including three cases under M.P. Excise Act.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well
as period of detention, without commenting on the merits of the
case, the application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant be
released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac) with one surety in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.51826/2021 (PRAMOD SHIVHARE VS. STATE OF M.P.)
appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in
case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
It is further directed that the applicant shall appear before the
S.H.O. Police Station Dehat Dabra, District Gwalior on 1st of
every month during the pendency of the Trial.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in
the case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
With aforesaid observations, this application is Allowed.
(G.S.Ahluwalia)
Pj'S/- Judge
Digitally signed by
PRINCEE BARAIYA
Date: 2021.10.25
17:30:16 -07'00'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!