Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

U.P. Road Transport Corporation vs Kamal Singh
2021 Latest Caselaw 6459 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6459 MP
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
U.P. Road Transport Corporation vs Kamal Singh on 5 October, 2021
Author: Anand Pathak
1
                                                          M.C.C.No.1138/2020

               HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                          BENCH AT GWALIOR
                          :SINGLE BENCH:


             {HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK}
                             MCC NO.1138/2020
                           Regional Manager & Anr.
                                         Vs.
                              Kamal Singh & Ors.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Prashant Sharma and Shri Prashant Singh Kaurav, learned counsel
for the applicants.
Shri Ravindra Sarvate, learned counsel for respondents No.1to4.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        ORDER

th (Passed on 5 day of October, 2021)

1. Heard on I.A.No.3497/2020, an application for condonation of

delay through virtual hearing mode.

2. On due consideration and the reasons assigned in the application,

delay occurred in filing of this restoration application appears to

be bona fide. Hence, application for condonation of delay is

allowed and delay in preferring the restoration application is

hereby condoned.

3. Heard on admission.

4. The present MCC has been preferred by the applicants seeking

restoration of M.A.No.2845/2017 which was dismissed vide

order dated 18-06-2019 in absence of counsel for the applicants

because of call given by the State Bar Council.

5. It is the grievance of the applicants that M.A.No.2845/2017 has

been preferred against the award dated 11-08-2017 passed by the

M.C.C.No.1138/2020

Additional Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karera

District Shivpuri in Claim Case No.07/2004. Matter was pending

consideration before the Court. On 18-06-2019 lawyers were

abstaining from work on a call given by the State Bar Council,

therefore, they did not appear. On the said date, after perusing the

record, Coordinate Bench discussed the case on merits and

dismissed the appeal preferred by the applicants. Through this

MCC, applicants intend to revive M.A.No.2845/2017. Learned

counsel for the applicants placed reliance over the judgment of

Apex Court in the matter of Shri Prabodh Ch. Das and Anr. Vs.

Mahamaya Das and Ors., AIR 2020 SC 178.

6. Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the prayer and

submits that since case has decided on merits, therefore, no case

for restoration is made out. Restoration application is barred by

time. He prayed for dismissal of restoration application.

7. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

8. This is a case where M.A.No.2845/2017 has been preferred

under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act taking exception to the

award dated 11-08-2017 passed by the Additional Member Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal. Matter was pending consideration on

dated 18-06-2019 when applicants did not appear because of call

given by the State Bar Council and lawyers abstained from work.

The said abstention is contrary to the mandate of Apex Court as

reflected in Ex Captain Harish Uppal Vs. Union of India,

M.C.C.No.1138/2020

(2003) 2 SCC 45 as well as Division Bench of this Court in

Praveen Pandey Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh, 2018 (4)

MPLJ 574 whereby said practice has been deprecated.

9. Perusal of order dated 18-06-2019 reveals that matter was

decided on merits and submissions of applicants have been taken

care of in detail. Besides that, judgment relied by the applicants

moves in different factual realm because said judgment is in

respect of Order XLI of CPC (appeal from original decree) and

present case is Miscellaneous Appeal under the provisions of

Motor Vehicles Act. Therefore, both the jurisdictions are

different.

10. Even otherwise when the case has been decided on merits, then

review petition in the garb of this restoration application is being

made by the applicants which is not permissible. Since the order

is passed on merits and not due to absence of counsel for the

applicants, therefore, plea of restoration is misplaced. Further,

case is filed after almost one and half year because order has

been passed on 18-06-2019 and present application has been

preferred on 12-10-2020.

11. Resultantly, application for restoration sans merits and is hereby

dismissed.

                                                                       (Anand Pathak)
                                                                           Judge

Anil*
        ANIL       Digitally signed by ANIL KUMAR
                   CHAURASIYA
                   DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF


        KUMAR
                   MADHYA PRADESH BENCH
                   GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT OF
                   MADHYA PRADESH BENCH
                   GWALIOR, postalCode=474001,

        CHAURASI   st=Madhya Pradesh,

2.5.4.20=8512f40a1a9eaa50b6802d0 68b51dae27e84c266b09d283f0799e

YA 67cdc7df50f, cn=ANIL KUMAR CHAURASIYA Date: 2021.10.05 13:51:34 -07'00'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter