Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7655 MP
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2021
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C.56632/2021 Devendra Gurjar vs. State of M.P.
Gwalior, Dated :22.11.2021
Shri Rajiv Sharma, Counsel for the applicant.
Shri C.P. Singh, Counsel for the State.
Case diary is available.
This first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been
filed for grant of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 07.08.2021 in connection
with Crime No.220/2021 registered at Police Station Kotwali Distt.
Morena for offence under Sections 307, 393/34 of IPC and under
Sections 11/13 of MPDVPK Act.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that by mistake,
it has been mentioned in the bail application that the offence has also
been registered under Sections 323/34 of IPC, whereas the offence
has been registered under Section 393/34 of IPC.
Therefore this application is being considered for offence under
Section 307, 393/34 of IPC.
It is submitted by the Counsel for the applicant that according
to the prosecution case, two to three unknown miscreants tried to
snatch the bag of the complainant. One miscreant fired a gun shot
causing gun shot injury to the complainant. However, on account of
resistance by the complainant and his gunmen, the miscreants could
not take away the bag and ultimately ran away. It is submitted that the
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C.56632/2021 Devendra Gurjar vs. State of M.P.
applicant was not put to Test Identification Parade. Even the
complainant and two more witnesses namely Kishanveer Singh and
Deep Singh Tomar have been examined and they have not supported
the case on the question of identification. At present there is no
substantive evidence against the applicant. The Trial is likely to take
sufficiently long time and there is no possibility of his absconding or
tampering with the prosecution case.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
counsel for the State. However, it was fairly conceded that the
miscreants could not succeed in taking away the bag which was
containing an amount of Rs. 8,00,000/-. However, after going through
the deposition of the witnesses, it is fairly conceded that none of the
witnesses has supported the case on the question of identity. It is
further submitted that all the eye witnesses have been examined.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without
commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is
directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal
bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac) with one surety
in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal
Court to appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned
Court.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.Cr.C.56632/2021 Devendra Gurjar vs. State of M.P.
the case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge ar
ABDUR Digitally signed by ABDUR RAHMAN DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, postalCode=474001, st=Madhya Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=d604b5a66b413c436e6af99c6fe547304e1bc26d2b510 cc133f1b56faa63e77b,
RAHMAN pseudonym=352E5BC6169A1C65270B76C8214AD91A9A2E28E B, serialNumber=1B0EA1B496C965067285A628B81AE07B60D342 048B7853E6108263F1DDCC0F50, cn=ABDUR RAHMAN Date: 2021.11.22 17:01:12 -08'00'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!