Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7297 MP
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2021
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC-53503-2021
Rajesh Meena Vs. State of M.P.
Gwalior, Dated : 11/11/2021
Shri Harendra Sharma, Counsel for applicant.
Shri C.P. Singh, Counsel for State.
Case diary is available.
This is third application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for
grant of bail. The second bail application was dismissed by order
dated 04.06.2021 passed in M.Cr.C. No.20423/2021 as withdrawn
with liberty to revive the prayer after examination of the prosecutrix.
The applicant has been arrested on 27.01.2021 in connection
with Crime No.06/2021 registered by Police Station Shamshabad,
District Vidisha for offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376
of IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act.
It is submitted by Counsel for the applicant that prosecutrix has
been examined and she has not supported the prosecution case. The
trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is no possibility
of his absconding or tampering with prosecution case.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by Counsel
for the respondent/State. It is submitted that it is true that the
prosecutrix has turned hostile but it appears that either she had made
a false report to the Police or she has not narrated the true facts before
the trial Court, therefore, she is liable to be prosecuted. It is further
submitted that as per FSL report, no human sperm was found on any
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-53503-2021 Rajesh Meena Vs. State of M.P.
of the incriminating articles of the prosecutrix, therefore, nothing has
been sent for DNA test.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
According to the prosecution case, prosecutrix is minor aged
about 16 years. Shri Singh has read out the statement of prosecutrix
recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C, in which she has alleged that
she was kidnapped by the applicant and they had physical
relationship in the running bus, whereas in the Court evidence, she
has stated that neither the applicant is known to her nor she went
along-with him but on the contrary, she on her own went to Bhopal.
Thus, it is clear that prosecutrix has resiled from her original
allegations and has categorically stated that no offence has been
committed with her and she was not subjected to any offence.
Whether the prosecutrix is liable to be prosecuted for giving
false evidence or not, is yet to be decided by the Trial Court. and it is
directed that the Trial Court while passing the final judgment will
consider this aspect and will give a specific finding on this aspect
also.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and
without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is
allowed. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail on
furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs.One Lac
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-53503-2021 Rajesh Meena Vs. State of M.P.
Only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the
Trial Court/Committal Court to appear before the Court on the dates
given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of the trial but in
case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
It is not known as to whether the State has paid any
compensation to the prosecutrix on account of registration of present
offence or not.
The Collector/Superintendent of Police Vidisha (Competent
Authority) is directed to file a report before the Principal Registrar of
this Court within a period of 1 month from today pointing out as to
whether any compensation amount was paid to prosecutrix on
account of registration of Crime No.06/2021 at Police Station
Samshabad, Vidisha or not. If any compensation was paid, then the
same shall be recovered as prosecutrix has claimed that she was not
subjected to any offence. Accordingly, it is held that she is not entitled
to any compensation.
Let the necessary report be filed before the Principal Registrar
of this Court latest by 15.12.2021.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the
case of Aparna Bhat & Ors. vs. State of M.P. passed on 18/3/2021
in Criminal Appeal No.329/2021, the intimation regarding grant of
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-53503-2021 Rajesh Meena Vs. State of M.P.
bail be sent to the complainant.
Two typed copies of this order be given to Shri C.P. Singh,
Counsel for State, for communicating the same to
Collector/Superintendent of Police Vidisha for necessary information
and compliance.
Certified copy as per rule.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge
Aman AMAN TIWARI 2021.11.11 15:59:42 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!